Predicting islet cell autoimmunity and type 1 diabetes: An 8-year teddy study progress report

TEDDY study group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Assessment of the predictive power of The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY)-identified risk factors for islet autoimmunity (IA), the type of autoantibody appearing first, and type 1 diabetes (T1D). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A total of 7,777 children were followed from birth to a median of 9.1 years of age for the development of islet autoantibodies and progression to T1D. Time-dependent sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated to provide estimates of their individual and collective ability to predict IA and T1D. RESULTS HLA genotype (DR3/4 vs. others) was the best predictor for IA (Youden’s index J = 0.117) and single nucleotide polymorphism rs2476601, in PTPN22, was the best predictor for insulin autoantibodies (IAA) appearing first (IAA-first) (J = 0.123). For GAD autoantibodies (GADA)-first, weight at 1 year was the best predictor (J = 0.114). In a multivariate model, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.678 (95% CI 0.655, 0.701), 0.707 (95% CI 0.676, 0.739), and 0.686 (95% CI 0.651, 0.722) for IA, IAA-first, and GADA-first, respectively, at 6 years. The AUC of the prediction model for T1D at 3 years after the appearance of multiple autoantibodies reached 0.706 (95% CI 0.649, 0.762). CONCLUSIONS Prediction modeling statistics are valuable tools, when applied in a time-until-event setting, to evaluate the ability of risk factors to discriminate between those who will and those who will not get disease. Although significantly associated with IA and T1D, the TEDDY risk factors individually contribute little to prediction. However, in combination, these factors increased IA and T1D prediction substantially.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1051-1060
Number of pages10
JournalDiabetes Care
Volume42
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2019

Fingerprint

Autoimmunity
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Islets of Langerhans
Autoantibodies
ROC Curve
HLA-DR3 Antigen
Insulin
Area Under Curve
Single Nucleotide Polymorphism
Research Design
Genotype
Parturition
Weights and Measures
Sensitivity and Specificity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Advanced and Specialized Nursing

Cite this

Predicting islet cell autoimmunity and type 1 diabetes : An 8-year teddy study progress report. / TEDDY study group.

In: Diabetes Care, Vol. 42, No. 6, 01.06.2019, p. 1051-1060.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c1b22e2985964305bd6dbcf673faaae0,
title = "Predicting islet cell autoimmunity and type 1 diabetes: An 8-year teddy study progress report",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE Assessment of the predictive power of The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY)-identified risk factors for islet autoimmunity (IA), the type of autoantibody appearing first, and type 1 diabetes (T1D). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A total of 7,777 children were followed from birth to a median of 9.1 years of age for the development of islet autoantibodies and progression to T1D. Time-dependent sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated to provide estimates of their individual and collective ability to predict IA and T1D. RESULTS HLA genotype (DR3/4 vs. others) was the best predictor for IA (Youden’s index J = 0.117) and single nucleotide polymorphism rs2476601, in PTPN22, was the best predictor for insulin autoantibodies (IAA) appearing first (IAA-first) (J = 0.123). For GAD autoantibodies (GADA)-first, weight at 1 year was the best predictor (J = 0.114). In a multivariate model, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.678 (95{\%} CI 0.655, 0.701), 0.707 (95{\%} CI 0.676, 0.739), and 0.686 (95{\%} CI 0.651, 0.722) for IA, IAA-first, and GADA-first, respectively, at 6 years. The AUC of the prediction model for T1D at 3 years after the appearance of multiple autoantibodies reached 0.706 (95{\%} CI 0.649, 0.762). CONCLUSIONS Prediction modeling statistics are valuable tools, when applied in a time-until-event setting, to evaluate the ability of risk factors to discriminate between those who will and those who will not get disease. Although significantly associated with IA and T1D, the TEDDY risk factors individually contribute little to prediction. However, in combination, these factors increased IA and T1D prediction substantially.",
author = "{TEDDY study group} and Krischer, {Jeffrey P.} and Xiang Liu and Kendra Vehik and Beena Akolkar and Hagopian, {William A.} and Rewers, {Marian J.} and She, {Jin Xiong} and Jin-Xiong She and Ziegler, {Anette G.} and Ake Lernmark",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2337/dc18-2282",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "1051--1060",
journal = "Diabetes Care",
issn = "1935-5548",
publisher = "American Diabetes Association Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predicting islet cell autoimmunity and type 1 diabetes

T2 - An 8-year teddy study progress report

AU - TEDDY study group

AU - Krischer, Jeffrey P.

AU - Liu, Xiang

AU - Vehik, Kendra

AU - Akolkar, Beena

AU - Hagopian, William A.

AU - Rewers, Marian J.

AU - She, Jin Xiong

AU - She, Jin-Xiong

AU - Ziegler, Anette G.

AU - Lernmark, Ake

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE Assessment of the predictive power of The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY)-identified risk factors for islet autoimmunity (IA), the type of autoantibody appearing first, and type 1 diabetes (T1D). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A total of 7,777 children were followed from birth to a median of 9.1 years of age for the development of islet autoantibodies and progression to T1D. Time-dependent sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated to provide estimates of their individual and collective ability to predict IA and T1D. RESULTS HLA genotype (DR3/4 vs. others) was the best predictor for IA (Youden’s index J = 0.117) and single nucleotide polymorphism rs2476601, in PTPN22, was the best predictor for insulin autoantibodies (IAA) appearing first (IAA-first) (J = 0.123). For GAD autoantibodies (GADA)-first, weight at 1 year was the best predictor (J = 0.114). In a multivariate model, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.678 (95% CI 0.655, 0.701), 0.707 (95% CI 0.676, 0.739), and 0.686 (95% CI 0.651, 0.722) for IA, IAA-first, and GADA-first, respectively, at 6 years. The AUC of the prediction model for T1D at 3 years after the appearance of multiple autoantibodies reached 0.706 (95% CI 0.649, 0.762). CONCLUSIONS Prediction modeling statistics are valuable tools, when applied in a time-until-event setting, to evaluate the ability of risk factors to discriminate between those who will and those who will not get disease. Although significantly associated with IA and T1D, the TEDDY risk factors individually contribute little to prediction. However, in combination, these factors increased IA and T1D prediction substantially.

AB - OBJECTIVE Assessment of the predictive power of The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY)-identified risk factors for islet autoimmunity (IA), the type of autoantibody appearing first, and type 1 diabetes (T1D). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A total of 7,777 children were followed from birth to a median of 9.1 years of age for the development of islet autoantibodies and progression to T1D. Time-dependent sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated to provide estimates of their individual and collective ability to predict IA and T1D. RESULTS HLA genotype (DR3/4 vs. others) was the best predictor for IA (Youden’s index J = 0.117) and single nucleotide polymorphism rs2476601, in PTPN22, was the best predictor for insulin autoantibodies (IAA) appearing first (IAA-first) (J = 0.123). For GAD autoantibodies (GADA)-first, weight at 1 year was the best predictor (J = 0.114). In a multivariate model, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.678 (95% CI 0.655, 0.701), 0.707 (95% CI 0.676, 0.739), and 0.686 (95% CI 0.651, 0.722) for IA, IAA-first, and GADA-first, respectively, at 6 years. The AUC of the prediction model for T1D at 3 years after the appearance of multiple autoantibodies reached 0.706 (95% CI 0.649, 0.762). CONCLUSIONS Prediction modeling statistics are valuable tools, when applied in a time-until-event setting, to evaluate the ability of risk factors to discriminate between those who will and those who will not get disease. Although significantly associated with IA and T1D, the TEDDY risk factors individually contribute little to prediction. However, in combination, these factors increased IA and T1D prediction substantially.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066448751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066448751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2337/dc18-2282

DO - 10.2337/dc18-2282

M3 - Article

C2 - 30967432

AN - SCOPUS:85066448751

VL - 42

SP - 1051

EP - 1060

JO - Diabetes Care

JF - Diabetes Care

SN - 1935-5548

IS - 6

ER -