Prosthetic design considerations for anterior single-implant restorations

Avishai Sadan, Markus B. Blatz, Mike Bellerino, Michael Block

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The anterior single-implant restoration provides a predictable solution for the partially edentulous patient. The two main approaches in prosthesis design for the single-implant restoration are the screw-retained and cement-retained restorations. Although both approaches have been proven to work from a standpoint of long-term implant stability, other considerations arise when esthetic outcome and ease of fabrication and delivery are discussed. To guarantee a predictable outcome, the dentist should choose a design that offers maximum prosthetic versatility. Combining prosthetic versatility with ease of delivery is often a clinical and laboratory challenge. Prostheses designs that provide the freedom to select a wide variety of restorative materials may be cumbersome to deliver and maintain and vice versa. This article reviews the advantages and shortcomings of each design and provides an alternative prosthesis design that combines the favorable aspects of these two restorations. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Screw-retained and cement-retained prostheses are the common designs for single-implant restorations and possess clinical advantages and shortcomings. An alternative and affordable design, that is mainly beneficial when standard stock implants components are used, is presented. It enables the clinician to achieve optimal esthetics in the esthetic zone combined with a simple and time-efficient delivery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)165-175
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2004

Fingerprint

Prosthesis Design
Esthetics
Dentists

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Prosthetic design considerations for anterior single-implant restorations. / Sadan, Avishai; Blatz, Markus B.; Bellerino, Mike; Block, Michael.

In: Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, Vol. 16, No. 3, 01.01.2004, p. 165-175.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Sadan, Avishai ; Blatz, Markus B. ; Bellerino, Mike ; Block, Michael. / Prosthetic design considerations for anterior single-implant restorations. In: Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2004 ; Vol. 16, No. 3. pp. 165-175.
@article{171a1dbb329046b4a136d0b698d03c63,
title = "Prosthetic design considerations for anterior single-implant restorations",
abstract = "The anterior single-implant restoration provides a predictable solution for the partially edentulous patient. The two main approaches in prosthesis design for the single-implant restoration are the screw-retained and cement-retained restorations. Although both approaches have been proven to work from a standpoint of long-term implant stability, other considerations arise when esthetic outcome and ease of fabrication and delivery are discussed. To guarantee a predictable outcome, the dentist should choose a design that offers maximum prosthetic versatility. Combining prosthetic versatility with ease of delivery is often a clinical and laboratory challenge. Prostheses designs that provide the freedom to select a wide variety of restorative materials may be cumbersome to deliver and maintain and vice versa. This article reviews the advantages and shortcomings of each design and provides an alternative prosthesis design that combines the favorable aspects of these two restorations. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Screw-retained and cement-retained prostheses are the common designs for single-implant restorations and possess clinical advantages and shortcomings. An alternative and affordable design, that is mainly beneficial when standard stock implants components are used, is presented. It enables the clinician to achieve optimal esthetics in the esthetic zone combined with a simple and time-efficient delivery.",
author = "Avishai Sadan and Blatz, {Markus B.} and Mike Bellerino and Michael Block",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1708-8240.2004.tb00028.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "165--175",
journal = "Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry",
issn = "1496-4155",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prosthetic design considerations for anterior single-implant restorations

AU - Sadan, Avishai

AU - Blatz, Markus B.

AU - Bellerino, Mike

AU - Block, Michael

PY - 2004/1/1

Y1 - 2004/1/1

N2 - The anterior single-implant restoration provides a predictable solution for the partially edentulous patient. The two main approaches in prosthesis design for the single-implant restoration are the screw-retained and cement-retained restorations. Although both approaches have been proven to work from a standpoint of long-term implant stability, other considerations arise when esthetic outcome and ease of fabrication and delivery are discussed. To guarantee a predictable outcome, the dentist should choose a design that offers maximum prosthetic versatility. Combining prosthetic versatility with ease of delivery is often a clinical and laboratory challenge. Prostheses designs that provide the freedom to select a wide variety of restorative materials may be cumbersome to deliver and maintain and vice versa. This article reviews the advantages and shortcomings of each design and provides an alternative prosthesis design that combines the favorable aspects of these two restorations. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Screw-retained and cement-retained prostheses are the common designs for single-implant restorations and possess clinical advantages and shortcomings. An alternative and affordable design, that is mainly beneficial when standard stock implants components are used, is presented. It enables the clinician to achieve optimal esthetics in the esthetic zone combined with a simple and time-efficient delivery.

AB - The anterior single-implant restoration provides a predictable solution for the partially edentulous patient. The two main approaches in prosthesis design for the single-implant restoration are the screw-retained and cement-retained restorations. Although both approaches have been proven to work from a standpoint of long-term implant stability, other considerations arise when esthetic outcome and ease of fabrication and delivery are discussed. To guarantee a predictable outcome, the dentist should choose a design that offers maximum prosthetic versatility. Combining prosthetic versatility with ease of delivery is often a clinical and laboratory challenge. Prostheses designs that provide the freedom to select a wide variety of restorative materials may be cumbersome to deliver and maintain and vice versa. This article reviews the advantages and shortcomings of each design and provides an alternative prosthesis design that combines the favorable aspects of these two restorations. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Screw-retained and cement-retained prostheses are the common designs for single-implant restorations and possess clinical advantages and shortcomings. An alternative and affordable design, that is mainly beneficial when standard stock implants components are used, is presented. It enables the clinician to achieve optimal esthetics in the esthetic zone combined with a simple and time-efficient delivery.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=8744289545&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=8744289545&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2004.tb00028.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2004.tb00028.x

M3 - Review article

C2 - 15597638

AN - SCOPUS:8744289545

VL - 16

SP - 165

EP - 175

JO - Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

JF - Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

SN - 1496-4155

IS - 3

ER -