Quality of the interface of primary tooth dentin bonded with antibacterial fluoride-releasing adhesive

Y. Hosoya, S. Ando, K. Yamaguchi, S. Oooka, M. Miyazaki, Franklin Chi Meng Tay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Limited information is available on the physical properties and ultrastructure of resin-dentin interfaces created in primary teeth. The interfacial quality of sound and caries-affected primary tooth dentin bonded with an antibacterial fluoride-releasing self-etch adhesive was examined in the present study. Methods: Primary molars were bonded with Clearfil Protect Bond (Kuraray Medical). A nano-indentation tester was employed for creating indentations vertically across resin-dentin interfaces of the bonded sound and caries-affected primary dentin for determination of hardness (H) and Young's modulus (Y). Statistical analysis were performed using one-way and two-way ANOVA and Fisher's PLSD test at p < 0.05. Similar resin-dentin interfaces were examined with SEM/EDX, and with TEM using ammoniacal silver nitrate tracer for nanoleakage. Results: In both sound and caries-affected dentin, compared to the underlying dentin, significantly lower values were seen in the H and Y values of the interfacial dentin except for the H in caries-affected dentin. No significant difference between the interfacial dentin and the underlying dentin was observed in the H of caries-affected dentin and the Ca and P contents in both sound and caries-affected dentin. TEM revealed extensive interfacial nanoleakage in bonded sound dentin, while no silver deposit in bonded caries-affected dentin. However, silver deposits were observed in the porous caries-affected dentin beneath the interface. Conclusion: Within the limitation of this study, Clearfil Protect Bond cannot demonstrate evidence of remineralization, does not increase the hardness and elasticity of the interfacial dentin, and does not prevent nanoleakage along the resin-dentin interface.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)423-430
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Dentistry
Volume38
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2010

Fingerprint

Deciduous Tooth
Dentin
Fluorides
Adhesives
Hardness
Silver
Silver Nitrate
Elastic Modulus
Elasticity

Keywords

  • Antibacterial adhesive
  • Caries-affected dentin
  • Fluoride-releasing adhesive
  • Hardness
  • Primary tooth dentin
  • Sound dentin
  • Two-step self-etch adhesive
  • Ultrastructure
  • Young's modulus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Quality of the interface of primary tooth dentin bonded with antibacterial fluoride-releasing adhesive. / Hosoya, Y.; Ando, S.; Yamaguchi, K.; Oooka, S.; Miyazaki, M.; Tay, Franklin Chi Meng.

In: Journal of Dentistry, Vol. 38, No. 5, 01.05.2010, p. 423-430.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hosoya, Y. ; Ando, S. ; Yamaguchi, K. ; Oooka, S. ; Miyazaki, M. ; Tay, Franklin Chi Meng. / Quality of the interface of primary tooth dentin bonded with antibacterial fluoride-releasing adhesive. In: Journal of Dentistry. 2010 ; Vol. 38, No. 5. pp. 423-430.
@article{466de804bf8b40be815b3ba60099df07,
title = "Quality of the interface of primary tooth dentin bonded with antibacterial fluoride-releasing adhesive",
abstract = "Objective: Limited information is available on the physical properties and ultrastructure of resin-dentin interfaces created in primary teeth. The interfacial quality of sound and caries-affected primary tooth dentin bonded with an antibacterial fluoride-releasing self-etch adhesive was examined in the present study. Methods: Primary molars were bonded with Clearfil Protect Bond (Kuraray Medical). A nano-indentation tester was employed for creating indentations vertically across resin-dentin interfaces of the bonded sound and caries-affected primary dentin for determination of hardness (H) and Young's modulus (Y). Statistical analysis were performed using one-way and two-way ANOVA and Fisher's PLSD test at p < 0.05. Similar resin-dentin interfaces were examined with SEM/EDX, and with TEM using ammoniacal silver nitrate tracer for nanoleakage. Results: In both sound and caries-affected dentin, compared to the underlying dentin, significantly lower values were seen in the H and Y values of the interfacial dentin except for the H in caries-affected dentin. No significant difference between the interfacial dentin and the underlying dentin was observed in the H of caries-affected dentin and the Ca and P contents in both sound and caries-affected dentin. TEM revealed extensive interfacial nanoleakage in bonded sound dentin, while no silver deposit in bonded caries-affected dentin. However, silver deposits were observed in the porous caries-affected dentin beneath the interface. Conclusion: Within the limitation of this study, Clearfil Protect Bond cannot demonstrate evidence of remineralization, does not increase the hardness and elasticity of the interfacial dentin, and does not prevent nanoleakage along the resin-dentin interface.",
keywords = "Antibacterial adhesive, Caries-affected dentin, Fluoride-releasing adhesive, Hardness, Primary tooth dentin, Sound dentin, Two-step self-etch adhesive, Ultrastructure, Young's modulus",
author = "Y. Hosoya and S. Ando and K. Yamaguchi and S. Oooka and M. Miyazaki and Tay, {Franklin Chi Meng}",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jdent.2010.02.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "423--430",
journal = "Journal of Dentistry",
issn = "0300-5712",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality of the interface of primary tooth dentin bonded with antibacterial fluoride-releasing adhesive

AU - Hosoya, Y.

AU - Ando, S.

AU - Yamaguchi, K.

AU - Oooka, S.

AU - Miyazaki, M.

AU - Tay, Franklin Chi Meng

PY - 2010/5/1

Y1 - 2010/5/1

N2 - Objective: Limited information is available on the physical properties and ultrastructure of resin-dentin interfaces created in primary teeth. The interfacial quality of sound and caries-affected primary tooth dentin bonded with an antibacterial fluoride-releasing self-etch adhesive was examined in the present study. Methods: Primary molars were bonded with Clearfil Protect Bond (Kuraray Medical). A nano-indentation tester was employed for creating indentations vertically across resin-dentin interfaces of the bonded sound and caries-affected primary dentin for determination of hardness (H) and Young's modulus (Y). Statistical analysis were performed using one-way and two-way ANOVA and Fisher's PLSD test at p < 0.05. Similar resin-dentin interfaces were examined with SEM/EDX, and with TEM using ammoniacal silver nitrate tracer for nanoleakage. Results: In both sound and caries-affected dentin, compared to the underlying dentin, significantly lower values were seen in the H and Y values of the interfacial dentin except for the H in caries-affected dentin. No significant difference between the interfacial dentin and the underlying dentin was observed in the H of caries-affected dentin and the Ca and P contents in both sound and caries-affected dentin. TEM revealed extensive interfacial nanoleakage in bonded sound dentin, while no silver deposit in bonded caries-affected dentin. However, silver deposits were observed in the porous caries-affected dentin beneath the interface. Conclusion: Within the limitation of this study, Clearfil Protect Bond cannot demonstrate evidence of remineralization, does not increase the hardness and elasticity of the interfacial dentin, and does not prevent nanoleakage along the resin-dentin interface.

AB - Objective: Limited information is available on the physical properties and ultrastructure of resin-dentin interfaces created in primary teeth. The interfacial quality of sound and caries-affected primary tooth dentin bonded with an antibacterial fluoride-releasing self-etch adhesive was examined in the present study. Methods: Primary molars were bonded with Clearfil Protect Bond (Kuraray Medical). A nano-indentation tester was employed for creating indentations vertically across resin-dentin interfaces of the bonded sound and caries-affected primary dentin for determination of hardness (H) and Young's modulus (Y). Statistical analysis were performed using one-way and two-way ANOVA and Fisher's PLSD test at p < 0.05. Similar resin-dentin interfaces were examined with SEM/EDX, and with TEM using ammoniacal silver nitrate tracer for nanoleakage. Results: In both sound and caries-affected dentin, compared to the underlying dentin, significantly lower values were seen in the H and Y values of the interfacial dentin except for the H in caries-affected dentin. No significant difference between the interfacial dentin and the underlying dentin was observed in the H of caries-affected dentin and the Ca and P contents in both sound and caries-affected dentin. TEM revealed extensive interfacial nanoleakage in bonded sound dentin, while no silver deposit in bonded caries-affected dentin. However, silver deposits were observed in the porous caries-affected dentin beneath the interface. Conclusion: Within the limitation of this study, Clearfil Protect Bond cannot demonstrate evidence of remineralization, does not increase the hardness and elasticity of the interfacial dentin, and does not prevent nanoleakage along the resin-dentin interface.

KW - Antibacterial adhesive

KW - Caries-affected dentin

KW - Fluoride-releasing adhesive

KW - Hardness

KW - Primary tooth dentin

KW - Sound dentin

KW - Two-step self-etch adhesive

KW - Ultrastructure

KW - Young's modulus

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950028318&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77950028318&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.02.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.02.001

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 423

EP - 430

JO - Journal of Dentistry

JF - Journal of Dentistry

SN - 0300-5712

IS - 5

ER -