Reactions to Laetrilomania

Len A. Billingsley, Jack R. Cooper, E. James Feeley, Willis Butler, Donna K. Thompson, William M. Dugan, Charles G. Craddock, Paul M Dainer, Harry J. Long

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To the Editor: Your views on Laetrile are infuriating (N Engl J Med 296:1167–1168, 1977). How can you support the use of a quack nostrum? How can you advocate a placebo to replace proper supportive counseling? Aren't you, like many other physicians, hiding behind a prescription pad when strong psychologic involvement is indicated? Furthermore, drugs are not to be put on the market and then tested, like thalidomide and chloramphenicol. To allow or advocate the use of Laetrile before it is proved safe and effective is the acme of hypocrisy when, for trivial reasons, safe and effective drugs such.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)218-221
Number of pages4
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume297
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 28 1977
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Amygdalin
Nostrums
Thalidomide
Chloramphenicol
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Prescriptions
Counseling
Placebos
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Billingsley, L. A., Cooper, J. R., Feeley, E. J., Butler, W., Thompson, D. K., Dugan, W. M., ... Long, H. J. (1977). Reactions to Laetrilomania. New England Journal of Medicine, 297(4), 218-221. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197707282970414

Reactions to Laetrilomania. / Billingsley, Len A.; Cooper, Jack R.; Feeley, E. James; Butler, Willis; Thompson, Donna K.; Dugan, William M.; Craddock, Charles G.; Dainer, Paul M; Long, Harry J.

In: New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 297, No. 4, 28.07.1977, p. 218-221.

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

Billingsley, LA, Cooper, JR, Feeley, EJ, Butler, W, Thompson, DK, Dugan, WM, Craddock, CG, Dainer, PM & Long, HJ 1977, 'Reactions to Laetrilomania', New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 297, no. 4, pp. 218-221. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197707282970414
Billingsley LA, Cooper JR, Feeley EJ, Butler W, Thompson DK, Dugan WM et al. Reactions to Laetrilomania. New England Journal of Medicine. 1977 Jul 28;297(4):218-221. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197707282970414
Billingsley, Len A. ; Cooper, Jack R. ; Feeley, E. James ; Butler, Willis ; Thompson, Donna K. ; Dugan, William M. ; Craddock, Charles G. ; Dainer, Paul M ; Long, Harry J. / Reactions to Laetrilomania. In: New England Journal of Medicine. 1977 ; Vol. 297, No. 4. pp. 218-221.
@article{c5412cdd888b495184908fb75c26ccb8,
title = "Reactions to Laetrilomania",
abstract = "To the Editor: Your views on Laetrile are infuriating (N Engl J Med 296:1167–1168, 1977). How can you support the use of a quack nostrum? How can you advocate a placebo to replace proper supportive counseling? Aren't you, like many other physicians, hiding behind a prescription pad when strong psychologic involvement is indicated? Furthermore, drugs are not to be put on the market and then tested, like thalidomide and chloramphenicol. To allow or advocate the use of Laetrile before it is proved safe and effective is the acme of hypocrisy when, for trivial reasons, safe and effective drugs such.",
author = "Billingsley, {Len A.} and Cooper, {Jack R.} and Feeley, {E. James} and Willis Butler and Thompson, {Donna K.} and Dugan, {William M.} and Craddock, {Charles G.} and Dainer, {Paul M} and Long, {Harry J.}",
year = "1977",
month = "7",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1056/NEJM197707282970414",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "297",
pages = "218--221",
journal = "New England Journal of Medicine",
issn = "0028-4793",
publisher = "Massachussetts Medical Society",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reactions to Laetrilomania

AU - Billingsley, Len A.

AU - Cooper, Jack R.

AU - Feeley, E. James

AU - Butler, Willis

AU - Thompson, Donna K.

AU - Dugan, William M.

AU - Craddock, Charles G.

AU - Dainer, Paul M

AU - Long, Harry J.

PY - 1977/7/28

Y1 - 1977/7/28

N2 - To the Editor: Your views on Laetrile are infuriating (N Engl J Med 296:1167–1168, 1977). How can you support the use of a quack nostrum? How can you advocate a placebo to replace proper supportive counseling? Aren't you, like many other physicians, hiding behind a prescription pad when strong psychologic involvement is indicated? Furthermore, drugs are not to be put on the market and then tested, like thalidomide and chloramphenicol. To allow or advocate the use of Laetrile before it is proved safe and effective is the acme of hypocrisy when, for trivial reasons, safe and effective drugs such.

AB - To the Editor: Your views on Laetrile are infuriating (N Engl J Med 296:1167–1168, 1977). How can you support the use of a quack nostrum? How can you advocate a placebo to replace proper supportive counseling? Aren't you, like many other physicians, hiding behind a prescription pad when strong psychologic involvement is indicated? Furthermore, drugs are not to be put on the market and then tested, like thalidomide and chloramphenicol. To allow or advocate the use of Laetrile before it is proved safe and effective is the acme of hypocrisy when, for trivial reasons, safe and effective drugs such.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85023581634&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85023581634&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1056/NEJM197707282970414

DO - 10.1056/NEJM197707282970414

M3 - Letter

VL - 297

SP - 218

EP - 221

JO - New England Journal of Medicine

JF - New England Journal of Medicine

SN - 0028-4793

IS - 4

ER -