Reasons Why Young Women Accept or Decline Fertility Preservation After Cancer Diagnosis

Patricia E. Hershberger, Heather Sipsma, Lorna Finnegan, Jennifer Hirshfeld-Cytron

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To understand young women's reasons for accepting or declining fertility preservation after cancer diagnosis to aid in the development of theory regarding decision making in this context. Design: Qualitative descriptive. Setting: Participants’ homes or other private location. Participants: Twenty-seven young women (mean age, 29 years) diagnosed with cancer and eligible for fertility preservation. Methods: Recruitment was conducted via the Internet and in fertility centers. Participants completed demographic questionnaires and in-depth semi-structured interviews. Tenets of grounded theory guided an inductive and deductive analysis. Results: Young women's reasons for deciding whether to undergo fertility preservation were linked to four theoretical dimensions: Cognitive Appraisals, Emotional Responses, Moral Judgments, and Decision Partners. Women who declined fertility preservation described more reasons in the Cognitive Appraisals dimension, including financial cost and human risks, than women who accepted. In the Emotional Responses dimension, most women who accepted fertility preservation reported a strong desire for biological motherhood, whereas women who declined tended to report a strong desire for surviving cancer. Three participants who declined reported reasons linked to the Moral Judgments dimension, and most participants were influenced by Decision Partners, including husbands, boyfriends, parents, and clinicians. Conclusion: The primary reason on which many but not all participants based decisions related to fertility preservation was whether the immediate emphasis of care should be placed on surviving cancer or securing options for future biological motherhood. Nurses and other clinicians should base education and counseling on the four theoretical dimensions to effectively support young women with cancer.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)123-134
Number of pages12
JournalJOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing
Volume45
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Fertility Preservation
Neoplasms
Nurse Clinicians
Spouses
Internet
Fertility
Counseling
Decision Making
Parents
Demography
Interviews
Education
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • decision-making
  • oncofertility
  • preference formation
  • qualitative research
  • survivorship
  • theory development

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics
  • Critical Care
  • Maternity and Midwifery

Cite this

Reasons Why Young Women Accept or Decline Fertility Preservation After Cancer Diagnosis. / Hershberger, Patricia E.; Sipsma, Heather; Finnegan, Lorna; Hirshfeld-Cytron, Jennifer.

In: JOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, Vol. 45, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 123-134.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hershberger, Patricia E. ; Sipsma, Heather ; Finnegan, Lorna ; Hirshfeld-Cytron, Jennifer. / Reasons Why Young Women Accept or Decline Fertility Preservation After Cancer Diagnosis. In: JOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing. 2016 ; Vol. 45, No. 1. pp. 123-134.
@article{ed97f3c9ce354a828bbca646689c58a4,
title = "Reasons Why Young Women Accept or Decline Fertility Preservation After Cancer Diagnosis",
abstract = "Objective: To understand young women's reasons for accepting or declining fertility preservation after cancer diagnosis to aid in the development of theory regarding decision making in this context. Design: Qualitative descriptive. Setting: Participants’ homes or other private location. Participants: Twenty-seven young women (mean age, 29 years) diagnosed with cancer and eligible for fertility preservation. Methods: Recruitment was conducted via the Internet and in fertility centers. Participants completed demographic questionnaires and in-depth semi-structured interviews. Tenets of grounded theory guided an inductive and deductive analysis. Results: Young women's reasons for deciding whether to undergo fertility preservation were linked to four theoretical dimensions: Cognitive Appraisals, Emotional Responses, Moral Judgments, and Decision Partners. Women who declined fertility preservation described more reasons in the Cognitive Appraisals dimension, including financial cost and human risks, than women who accepted. In the Emotional Responses dimension, most women who accepted fertility preservation reported a strong desire for biological motherhood, whereas women who declined tended to report a strong desire for surviving cancer. Three participants who declined reported reasons linked to the Moral Judgments dimension, and most participants were influenced by Decision Partners, including husbands, boyfriends, parents, and clinicians. Conclusion: The primary reason on which many but not all participants based decisions related to fertility preservation was whether the immediate emphasis of care should be placed on surviving cancer or securing options for future biological motherhood. Nurses and other clinicians should base education and counseling on the four theoretical dimensions to effectively support young women with cancer.",
keywords = "decision-making, oncofertility, preference formation, qualitative research, survivorship, theory development",
author = "Hershberger, {Patricia E.} and Heather Sipsma and Lorna Finnegan and Jennifer Hirshfeld-Cytron",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jogn.2015.10.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "123--134",
journal = "JOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing",
issn = "0884-2175",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reasons Why Young Women Accept or Decline Fertility Preservation After Cancer Diagnosis

AU - Hershberger, Patricia E.

AU - Sipsma, Heather

AU - Finnegan, Lorna

AU - Hirshfeld-Cytron, Jennifer

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Objective: To understand young women's reasons for accepting or declining fertility preservation after cancer diagnosis to aid in the development of theory regarding decision making in this context. Design: Qualitative descriptive. Setting: Participants’ homes or other private location. Participants: Twenty-seven young women (mean age, 29 years) diagnosed with cancer and eligible for fertility preservation. Methods: Recruitment was conducted via the Internet and in fertility centers. Participants completed demographic questionnaires and in-depth semi-structured interviews. Tenets of grounded theory guided an inductive and deductive analysis. Results: Young women's reasons for deciding whether to undergo fertility preservation were linked to four theoretical dimensions: Cognitive Appraisals, Emotional Responses, Moral Judgments, and Decision Partners. Women who declined fertility preservation described more reasons in the Cognitive Appraisals dimension, including financial cost and human risks, than women who accepted. In the Emotional Responses dimension, most women who accepted fertility preservation reported a strong desire for biological motherhood, whereas women who declined tended to report a strong desire for surviving cancer. Three participants who declined reported reasons linked to the Moral Judgments dimension, and most participants were influenced by Decision Partners, including husbands, boyfriends, parents, and clinicians. Conclusion: The primary reason on which many but not all participants based decisions related to fertility preservation was whether the immediate emphasis of care should be placed on surviving cancer or securing options for future biological motherhood. Nurses and other clinicians should base education and counseling on the four theoretical dimensions to effectively support young women with cancer.

AB - Objective: To understand young women's reasons for accepting or declining fertility preservation after cancer diagnosis to aid in the development of theory regarding decision making in this context. Design: Qualitative descriptive. Setting: Participants’ homes or other private location. Participants: Twenty-seven young women (mean age, 29 years) diagnosed with cancer and eligible for fertility preservation. Methods: Recruitment was conducted via the Internet and in fertility centers. Participants completed demographic questionnaires and in-depth semi-structured interviews. Tenets of grounded theory guided an inductive and deductive analysis. Results: Young women's reasons for deciding whether to undergo fertility preservation were linked to four theoretical dimensions: Cognitive Appraisals, Emotional Responses, Moral Judgments, and Decision Partners. Women who declined fertility preservation described more reasons in the Cognitive Appraisals dimension, including financial cost and human risks, than women who accepted. In the Emotional Responses dimension, most women who accepted fertility preservation reported a strong desire for biological motherhood, whereas women who declined tended to report a strong desire for surviving cancer. Three participants who declined reported reasons linked to the Moral Judgments dimension, and most participants were influenced by Decision Partners, including husbands, boyfriends, parents, and clinicians. Conclusion: The primary reason on which many but not all participants based decisions related to fertility preservation was whether the immediate emphasis of care should be placed on surviving cancer or securing options for future biological motherhood. Nurses and other clinicians should base education and counseling on the four theoretical dimensions to effectively support young women with cancer.

KW - decision-making

KW - oncofertility

KW - preference formation

KW - qualitative research

KW - survivorship

KW - theory development

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020325003&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85020325003&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jogn.2015.10.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jogn.2015.10.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 26815806

AN - SCOPUS:85020325003

VL - 45

SP - 123

EP - 134

JO - JOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing

JF - JOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing

SN - 0884-2175

IS - 1

ER -