Recall bias in epidemiologic studies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

529 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The factors which contribute to bias due to differential recall between cases and controls in retrospective studies have been little studied. A review of the literature on recall accuracy suggests that the extent of inaccurate recall is related to characteristics of the exposure of interest and of the respondents, though a distinction must be drawn between recall which is biased and that which is simply inaccurate. Interviewing technique and the study protocol, including the design of questionnaires and the motivation of respondents, play a central role and are under the control of the investigator. The results of validation studies carried out to date suggest that the likelihood of recall bias may be greater when recall is poor in general.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)87-91
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1990
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Epidemiologic Studies
Validation Studies
Retrospective Studies
Research Personnel
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Bias
  • Methods
  • Misclassification
  • Recall
  • Study design
  • Validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Recall bias in epidemiologic studies. / Coughlin, Steven Scott.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 43, No. 1, 01.01.1990, p. 87-91.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1b01b1a35f2d429cb4a2cdc9337c3e61,
title = "Recall bias in epidemiologic studies",
abstract = "The factors which contribute to bias due to differential recall between cases and controls in retrospective studies have been little studied. A review of the literature on recall accuracy suggests that the extent of inaccurate recall is related to characteristics of the exposure of interest and of the respondents, though a distinction must be drawn between recall which is biased and that which is simply inaccurate. Interviewing technique and the study protocol, including the design of questionnaires and the motivation of respondents, play a central role and are under the control of the investigator. The results of validation studies carried out to date suggest that the likelihood of recall bias may be greater when recall is poor in general.",
keywords = "Bias, Methods, Misclassification, Recall, Study design, Validity",
author = "Coughlin, {Steven Scott}",
year = "1990",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0895-4356(90)90060-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "87--91",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recall bias in epidemiologic studies

AU - Coughlin, Steven Scott

PY - 1990/1/1

Y1 - 1990/1/1

N2 - The factors which contribute to bias due to differential recall between cases and controls in retrospective studies have been little studied. A review of the literature on recall accuracy suggests that the extent of inaccurate recall is related to characteristics of the exposure of interest and of the respondents, though a distinction must be drawn between recall which is biased and that which is simply inaccurate. Interviewing technique and the study protocol, including the design of questionnaires and the motivation of respondents, play a central role and are under the control of the investigator. The results of validation studies carried out to date suggest that the likelihood of recall bias may be greater when recall is poor in general.

AB - The factors which contribute to bias due to differential recall between cases and controls in retrospective studies have been little studied. A review of the literature on recall accuracy suggests that the extent of inaccurate recall is related to characteristics of the exposure of interest and of the respondents, though a distinction must be drawn between recall which is biased and that which is simply inaccurate. Interviewing technique and the study protocol, including the design of questionnaires and the motivation of respondents, play a central role and are under the control of the investigator. The results of validation studies carried out to date suggest that the likelihood of recall bias may be greater when recall is poor in general.

KW - Bias

KW - Methods

KW - Misclassification

KW - Recall

KW - Study design

KW - Validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025159278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025159278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0895-4356(90)90060-3

DO - 10.1016/0895-4356(90)90060-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 2319285

AN - SCOPUS:0025159278

VL - 43

SP - 87

EP - 91

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

IS - 1

ER -