Recruitment challenges of a multicenter randomized controlled varicocelectomy trial

J. C. Trussell, Gregory M. Christman, Dana A. Ohl, Richard S. Legro, Stephen A. Krawetz, Peter J. Snyder, Pasquale Patrizio, Alex J. Polotsky, Michael Peter Diamond, Peter R. Casson, Christos Coutifaris, Kurt Barnhart, Robert G. Brzyski, William D. Schlaff, Randall Meacham, David Shin, Tracey Thomas, Meizhuo Zhang, Nanette Santoro, Esther EisenbergHeping Zhang

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To review reasons for suboptimal recruitment for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of varicocelectomy versus intrauterine insemination (IUI) for treatment of male infertility and to suggest means for improving future study recruitment. Design: Survey of Reproductive Medicine Network (RMN) participating sites. Setting: Reproductive Medicine Network. Patient(s): None. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Ascertain reasons for inadequate recruitment and suggest improvements for future varicocelectomy trails. Result(s): This study screened seven and enrolled three couples, with the first couple randomized on June 30, 2010. The study was subsequently stopped on March 30, 2011. The following themes were cited most frequently by sites and therefore determined to be most likely to have played a role in suboptimal recruitment: [1] men must be screened at the beginning of a couple's infertility evaluation, [2] inclusion of infertile women who had failed previous fertility interventions appeared to be associated with the couple's intolerance of a placebo arm, and [3] an apparent bias against the use of unstimulated IUI cycles indicated a prejudicial preference for surgical intervention in the male partner. Conclusion(s): Improved recruitment may be realized through screening infertile men as early as possible while minimizing study-related time commitments. Focused patient education may promote improved equipoise and acceptance of a placebo arm in male infertility studies. Creative approaches to implementing varicocelectomy trials must be considered in addition to having a network of motivated researchers who carry a high volume of possible study participants because very large numbers may need to be screened to complete the clinical trial enrollment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1299-1305
Number of pages7
JournalFertility and sterility
Volume96
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Reproductive Medicine
Insemination
Male Infertility
Randomized Controlled Trials
Placebos
Patient Education
Infertility
Fertility
Research Personnel
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Clinical Trials
Therapeutics
boldenone undecylenate
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Accrual
  • consent
  • enrollment
  • prospective
  • randomization
  • recruitment
  • varicocele
  • varicocelectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Trussell, J. C., Christman, G. M., Ohl, D. A., Legro, R. S., Krawetz, S. A., Snyder, P. J., ... Zhang, H. (2011). Recruitment challenges of a multicenter randomized controlled varicocelectomy trial. Fertility and sterility, 96(6), 1299-1305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.10.025

Recruitment challenges of a multicenter randomized controlled varicocelectomy trial. / Trussell, J. C.; Christman, Gregory M.; Ohl, Dana A.; Legro, Richard S.; Krawetz, Stephen A.; Snyder, Peter J.; Patrizio, Pasquale; Polotsky, Alex J.; Diamond, Michael Peter; Casson, Peter R.; Coutifaris, Christos; Barnhart, Kurt; Brzyski, Robert G.; Schlaff, William D.; Meacham, Randall; Shin, David; Thomas, Tracey; Zhang, Meizhuo; Santoro, Nanette; Eisenberg, Esther; Zhang, Heping.

In: Fertility and sterility, Vol. 96, No. 6, 01.01.2011, p. 1299-1305.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Trussell, JC, Christman, GM, Ohl, DA, Legro, RS, Krawetz, SA, Snyder, PJ, Patrizio, P, Polotsky, AJ, Diamond, MP, Casson, PR, Coutifaris, C, Barnhart, K, Brzyski, RG, Schlaff, WD, Meacham, R, Shin, D, Thomas, T, Zhang, M, Santoro, N, Eisenberg, E & Zhang, H 2011, 'Recruitment challenges of a multicenter randomized controlled varicocelectomy trial', Fertility and sterility, vol. 96, no. 6, pp. 1299-1305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.10.025
Trussell JC, Christman GM, Ohl DA, Legro RS, Krawetz SA, Snyder PJ et al. Recruitment challenges of a multicenter randomized controlled varicocelectomy trial. Fertility and sterility. 2011 Jan 1;96(6):1299-1305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.10.025
Trussell, J. C. ; Christman, Gregory M. ; Ohl, Dana A. ; Legro, Richard S. ; Krawetz, Stephen A. ; Snyder, Peter J. ; Patrizio, Pasquale ; Polotsky, Alex J. ; Diamond, Michael Peter ; Casson, Peter R. ; Coutifaris, Christos ; Barnhart, Kurt ; Brzyski, Robert G. ; Schlaff, William D. ; Meacham, Randall ; Shin, David ; Thomas, Tracey ; Zhang, Meizhuo ; Santoro, Nanette ; Eisenberg, Esther ; Zhang, Heping. / Recruitment challenges of a multicenter randomized controlled varicocelectomy trial. In: Fertility and sterility. 2011 ; Vol. 96, No. 6. pp. 1299-1305.
@article{8eab07d9ead94550b325ffd83ecd11e8,
title = "Recruitment challenges of a multicenter randomized controlled varicocelectomy trial",
abstract = "Objective: To review reasons for suboptimal recruitment for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of varicocelectomy versus intrauterine insemination (IUI) for treatment of male infertility and to suggest means for improving future study recruitment. Design: Survey of Reproductive Medicine Network (RMN) participating sites. Setting: Reproductive Medicine Network. Patient(s): None. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Ascertain reasons for inadequate recruitment and suggest improvements for future varicocelectomy trails. Result(s): This study screened seven and enrolled three couples, with the first couple randomized on June 30, 2010. The study was subsequently stopped on March 30, 2011. The following themes were cited most frequently by sites and therefore determined to be most likely to have played a role in suboptimal recruitment: [1] men must be screened at the beginning of a couple's infertility evaluation, [2] inclusion of infertile women who had failed previous fertility interventions appeared to be associated with the couple's intolerance of a placebo arm, and [3] an apparent bias against the use of unstimulated IUI cycles indicated a prejudicial preference for surgical intervention in the male partner. Conclusion(s): Improved recruitment may be realized through screening infertile men as early as possible while minimizing study-related time commitments. Focused patient education may promote improved equipoise and acceptance of a placebo arm in male infertility studies. Creative approaches to implementing varicocelectomy trials must be considered in addition to having a network of motivated researchers who carry a high volume of possible study participants because very large numbers may need to be screened to complete the clinical trial enrollment.",
keywords = "Accrual, consent, enrollment, prospective, randomization, recruitment, varicocele, varicocelectomy",
author = "Trussell, {J. C.} and Christman, {Gregory M.} and Ohl, {Dana A.} and Legro, {Richard S.} and Krawetz, {Stephen A.} and Snyder, {Peter J.} and Pasquale Patrizio and Polotsky, {Alex J.} and Diamond, {Michael Peter} and Casson, {Peter R.} and Christos Coutifaris and Kurt Barnhart and Brzyski, {Robert G.} and Schlaff, {William D.} and Randall Meacham and David Shin and Tracey Thomas and Meizhuo Zhang and Nanette Santoro and Esther Eisenberg and Heping Zhang",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.10.025",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "96",
pages = "1299--1305",
journal = "Fertility and Sterility",
issn = "0015-0282",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recruitment challenges of a multicenter randomized controlled varicocelectomy trial

AU - Trussell, J. C.

AU - Christman, Gregory M.

AU - Ohl, Dana A.

AU - Legro, Richard S.

AU - Krawetz, Stephen A.

AU - Snyder, Peter J.

AU - Patrizio, Pasquale

AU - Polotsky, Alex J.

AU - Diamond, Michael Peter

AU - Casson, Peter R.

AU - Coutifaris, Christos

AU - Barnhart, Kurt

AU - Brzyski, Robert G.

AU - Schlaff, William D.

AU - Meacham, Randall

AU - Shin, David

AU - Thomas, Tracey

AU - Zhang, Meizhuo

AU - Santoro, Nanette

AU - Eisenberg, Esther

AU - Zhang, Heping

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Objective: To review reasons for suboptimal recruitment for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of varicocelectomy versus intrauterine insemination (IUI) for treatment of male infertility and to suggest means for improving future study recruitment. Design: Survey of Reproductive Medicine Network (RMN) participating sites. Setting: Reproductive Medicine Network. Patient(s): None. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Ascertain reasons for inadequate recruitment and suggest improvements for future varicocelectomy trails. Result(s): This study screened seven and enrolled three couples, with the first couple randomized on June 30, 2010. The study was subsequently stopped on March 30, 2011. The following themes were cited most frequently by sites and therefore determined to be most likely to have played a role in suboptimal recruitment: [1] men must be screened at the beginning of a couple's infertility evaluation, [2] inclusion of infertile women who had failed previous fertility interventions appeared to be associated with the couple's intolerance of a placebo arm, and [3] an apparent bias against the use of unstimulated IUI cycles indicated a prejudicial preference for surgical intervention in the male partner. Conclusion(s): Improved recruitment may be realized through screening infertile men as early as possible while minimizing study-related time commitments. Focused patient education may promote improved equipoise and acceptance of a placebo arm in male infertility studies. Creative approaches to implementing varicocelectomy trials must be considered in addition to having a network of motivated researchers who carry a high volume of possible study participants because very large numbers may need to be screened to complete the clinical trial enrollment.

AB - Objective: To review reasons for suboptimal recruitment for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of varicocelectomy versus intrauterine insemination (IUI) for treatment of male infertility and to suggest means for improving future study recruitment. Design: Survey of Reproductive Medicine Network (RMN) participating sites. Setting: Reproductive Medicine Network. Patient(s): None. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Ascertain reasons for inadequate recruitment and suggest improvements for future varicocelectomy trails. Result(s): This study screened seven and enrolled three couples, with the first couple randomized on June 30, 2010. The study was subsequently stopped on March 30, 2011. The following themes were cited most frequently by sites and therefore determined to be most likely to have played a role in suboptimal recruitment: [1] men must be screened at the beginning of a couple's infertility evaluation, [2] inclusion of infertile women who had failed previous fertility interventions appeared to be associated with the couple's intolerance of a placebo arm, and [3] an apparent bias against the use of unstimulated IUI cycles indicated a prejudicial preference for surgical intervention in the male partner. Conclusion(s): Improved recruitment may be realized through screening infertile men as early as possible while minimizing study-related time commitments. Focused patient education may promote improved equipoise and acceptance of a placebo arm in male infertility studies. Creative approaches to implementing varicocelectomy trials must be considered in addition to having a network of motivated researchers who carry a high volume of possible study participants because very large numbers may need to be screened to complete the clinical trial enrollment.

KW - Accrual

KW - consent

KW - enrollment

KW - prospective

KW - randomization

KW - recruitment

KW - varicocele

KW - varicocelectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82455217339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=82455217339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.10.025

DO - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.10.025

M3 - Review article

C2 - 22130101

AN - SCOPUS:82455217339

VL - 96

SP - 1299

EP - 1305

JO - Fertility and Sterility

JF - Fertility and Sterility

SN - 0015-0282

IS - 6

ER -