Robotic-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomies

Early experience and review of the literature

Stuart Geffner, Zachary W A Klaassen, Matthew Tichauer, Ronald S. Chamberlain, Prakash R. Paragi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

With over 80,000 patients in the United States awaiting kidney transplantation, renal transplant surgery continues to evolve with attractive surgical options for living donation, which include laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) and robotic-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (RALDN). LDN is currently accepted as the gold standard procedure for living donor nephrectomy; RALDN is an evolving technique and may emerge as a preferred procedure over time. We present our initial experience with RALDN from December 2007 to August 2008. Thirty-five patients who underwent RALND were retrospectively analyzed and compared with 35 age- and time (year)-matched patients who underwent LDN. The parameters analyzed were length of hospital stay (3.2 ± 0.9 days, P < 0.59), estimated blood loss (146 ± 363 ml, P < 0.36), operating time (149 ± 44 min, P < 0.23), cold ischemic time (135 ± 202 min, P < 0.19), preoperative creatinine (0.82 ± 0.26 mg/dl, P < 0.46) and postoperative creatinine (1.44 ± 1.03 mg/dl, P < 0.20). There was no statistical difference between RALDN patients with single renal artery (n = 27) and those with more than one renal artery (n = 8) kidneys. There was one serious complication requiring conversion to open laparotomy to control a bleeding renal artery stump following extraction of the kidney. One-year graft survival for the 35 recipients of RALDN was 97.1%. RALDN is feasible and compares favorably to the standard LDN procedure with good graft survival. Robotic-assisted transplant surgery is an emerging technique with potential benefits to both surgeon and patient.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)115-120
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Robotic Surgery
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Robotics
Nephrectomy
Tissue Donors
Renal Artery
Graft Survival
Kidney
Length of Stay
Creatinine
Transplants
Cold Ischemia
Living Donors
Kidney Transplantation
Laparotomy
Hemorrhage

Keywords

  • Kidney transplant
  • Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy
  • Renal allograft
  • Robotic surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomies : Early experience and review of the literature. / Geffner, Stuart; Klaassen, Zachary W A; Tichauer, Matthew; Chamberlain, Ronald S.; Paragi, Prakash R.

In: Journal of Robotic Surgery, Vol. 5, No. 2, 01.06.2011, p. 115-120.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Geffner, Stuart ; Klaassen, Zachary W A ; Tichauer, Matthew ; Chamberlain, Ronald S. ; Paragi, Prakash R. / Robotic-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomies : Early experience and review of the literature. In: Journal of Robotic Surgery. 2011 ; Vol. 5, No. 2. pp. 115-120.
@article{a99e6071e1174084aaec6991fae1ec49,
title = "Robotic-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomies: Early experience and review of the literature",
abstract = "With over 80,000 patients in the United States awaiting kidney transplantation, renal transplant surgery continues to evolve with attractive surgical options for living donation, which include laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) and robotic-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (RALDN). LDN is currently accepted as the gold standard procedure for living donor nephrectomy; RALDN is an evolving technique and may emerge as a preferred procedure over time. We present our initial experience with RALDN from December 2007 to August 2008. Thirty-five patients who underwent RALND were retrospectively analyzed and compared with 35 age- and time (year)-matched patients who underwent LDN. The parameters analyzed were length of hospital stay (3.2 ± 0.9 days, P < 0.59), estimated blood loss (146 ± 363 ml, P < 0.36), operating time (149 ± 44 min, P < 0.23), cold ischemic time (135 ± 202 min, P < 0.19), preoperative creatinine (0.82 ± 0.26 mg/dl, P < 0.46) and postoperative creatinine (1.44 ± 1.03 mg/dl, P < 0.20). There was no statistical difference between RALDN patients with single renal artery (n = 27) and those with more than one renal artery (n = 8) kidneys. There was one serious complication requiring conversion to open laparotomy to control a bleeding renal artery stump following extraction of the kidney. One-year graft survival for the 35 recipients of RALDN was 97.1{\%}. RALDN is feasible and compares favorably to the standard LDN procedure with good graft survival. Robotic-assisted transplant surgery is an emerging technique with potential benefits to both surgeon and patient.",
keywords = "Kidney transplant, Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy, Renal allograft, Robotic surgery",
author = "Stuart Geffner and Klaassen, {Zachary W A} and Matthew Tichauer and Chamberlain, {Ronald S.} and Paragi, {Prakash R.}",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11701-011-0245-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "115--120",
journal = "Journal of Robotic Surgery",
issn = "1863-2483",
publisher = "Springer London",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Robotic-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomies

T2 - Early experience and review of the literature

AU - Geffner, Stuart

AU - Klaassen, Zachary W A

AU - Tichauer, Matthew

AU - Chamberlain, Ronald S.

AU - Paragi, Prakash R.

PY - 2011/6/1

Y1 - 2011/6/1

N2 - With over 80,000 patients in the United States awaiting kidney transplantation, renal transplant surgery continues to evolve with attractive surgical options for living donation, which include laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) and robotic-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (RALDN). LDN is currently accepted as the gold standard procedure for living donor nephrectomy; RALDN is an evolving technique and may emerge as a preferred procedure over time. We present our initial experience with RALDN from December 2007 to August 2008. Thirty-five patients who underwent RALND were retrospectively analyzed and compared with 35 age- and time (year)-matched patients who underwent LDN. The parameters analyzed were length of hospital stay (3.2 ± 0.9 days, P < 0.59), estimated blood loss (146 ± 363 ml, P < 0.36), operating time (149 ± 44 min, P < 0.23), cold ischemic time (135 ± 202 min, P < 0.19), preoperative creatinine (0.82 ± 0.26 mg/dl, P < 0.46) and postoperative creatinine (1.44 ± 1.03 mg/dl, P < 0.20). There was no statistical difference between RALDN patients with single renal artery (n = 27) and those with more than one renal artery (n = 8) kidneys. There was one serious complication requiring conversion to open laparotomy to control a bleeding renal artery stump following extraction of the kidney. One-year graft survival for the 35 recipients of RALDN was 97.1%. RALDN is feasible and compares favorably to the standard LDN procedure with good graft survival. Robotic-assisted transplant surgery is an emerging technique with potential benefits to both surgeon and patient.

AB - With over 80,000 patients in the United States awaiting kidney transplantation, renal transplant surgery continues to evolve with attractive surgical options for living donation, which include laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) and robotic-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (RALDN). LDN is currently accepted as the gold standard procedure for living donor nephrectomy; RALDN is an evolving technique and may emerge as a preferred procedure over time. We present our initial experience with RALDN from December 2007 to August 2008. Thirty-five patients who underwent RALND were retrospectively analyzed and compared with 35 age- and time (year)-matched patients who underwent LDN. The parameters analyzed were length of hospital stay (3.2 ± 0.9 days, P < 0.59), estimated blood loss (146 ± 363 ml, P < 0.36), operating time (149 ± 44 min, P < 0.23), cold ischemic time (135 ± 202 min, P < 0.19), preoperative creatinine (0.82 ± 0.26 mg/dl, P < 0.46) and postoperative creatinine (1.44 ± 1.03 mg/dl, P < 0.20). There was no statistical difference between RALDN patients with single renal artery (n = 27) and those with more than one renal artery (n = 8) kidneys. There was one serious complication requiring conversion to open laparotomy to control a bleeding renal artery stump following extraction of the kidney. One-year graft survival for the 35 recipients of RALDN was 97.1%. RALDN is feasible and compares favorably to the standard LDN procedure with good graft survival. Robotic-assisted transplant surgery is an emerging technique with potential benefits to both surgeon and patient.

KW - Kidney transplant

KW - Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy

KW - Renal allograft

KW - Robotic surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957447350&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79957447350&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11701-011-0245-z

DO - 10.1007/s11701-011-0245-z

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 115

EP - 120

JO - Journal of Robotic Surgery

JF - Journal of Robotic Surgery

SN - 1863-2483

IS - 2

ER -