Safety and efficacy of patient specific intramuscular injection of HGF plasmid gene therapy on limb perfusion and wound healing in patients with ischemic lower extremity ulceration: Results of the HGF-0205 trial

Richard J. Powell, Phillip Goodney, Farrell O. Mendelsohn, Elaine K. Moen, Brian H. Annex

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives We have previously reported the results of a dose-finding phase II trial showing that HGF angiogenic gene therapy can increase TcPO2 compared with placebo in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). The purpose of this randomized placebo controlled multi-center trial was to further assess the safety and clinical efficacy of a modified HGF gene delivery technique in patients with CLI and no revascularization options. Methods Patients with lower extremity ischemic tissue loss (Rutherford 5 and 6) received three sets of eight intramuscular injections every 2 weeks of HGF plasmid under duplex ultrasound guidance. Injection locations were individualized for each patient based on arteriographically defined vascular anatomy. Primary safety end point was incidence of adverse events (AE) or serious adverse events (SAE). Clinical end points included change from baseline in toe brachial index (TBI), rest pain assessment by a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS) as well as wound healing, amputation, and survival at 3 and 6 months. Results Randomization ratio was 3:1 HGF (n = 21) vs placebo (n = 6). Mean age was 76 ± 2 years, with 56% male and 59% diabetic. There was no difference in demographics between groups. There was no difference in AEs or SAEs, which consisted mostly of transient injection site discomfort, worsening of CLI, and intercurrent illnesses. Change in TBI significantly improved from baseline at 6 months in the HGF-treated group compared with placebo (0.05 ± 0.05 vs -0.17 ± 0.04; P = .047). Change in VAS from baseline at 6 months was also significantly improved in the HGF-treated group compared with placebo (-1.9 ± 1.3 vs +0.06 ± 0.2; P = .04). Complete ulcer healing at 12 months occurred in 31% of the HGF group and 0% of the placebo (P = .28) There was no difference in major amputation of the treated limb (HGF 29% vs placebo 33%) or mortality at 12 months (HGF 19% vs placebo 17%) between groups. Conclusion HGF gene therapy using a patient vascular anatomy specific delivery technique appears safe, maintained limb perfusion, and decreased rest pain in patients with CLI compared with placebo. A larger study to assess the efficacy of this therapy on more clinically relevant end points is warranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1525-1530
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Vascular Surgery
Volume52
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Intramuscular Injections
Patient Safety
Genetic Therapy
Wound Healing
Lower Extremity
Plasmids
Extremities
Perfusion
Placebos
Ischemia
Ankle Brachial Index
Visual Analog Scale
Amputation
Blood Vessels
Anatomy
Safety
Injections
Pain Measurement
Random Allocation
Ulcer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Safety and efficacy of patient specific intramuscular injection of HGF plasmid gene therapy on limb perfusion and wound healing in patients with ischemic lower extremity ulceration : Results of the HGF-0205 trial. / Powell, Richard J.; Goodney, Phillip; Mendelsohn, Farrell O.; Moen, Elaine K.; Annex, Brian H.

In: Journal of Vascular Surgery, Vol. 52, No. 6, 01.12.2010, p. 1525-1530.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6285ed62e7dd44a2ae840b6387e70f31,
title = "Safety and efficacy of patient specific intramuscular injection of HGF plasmid gene therapy on limb perfusion and wound healing in patients with ischemic lower extremity ulceration: Results of the HGF-0205 trial",
abstract = "Objectives We have previously reported the results of a dose-finding phase II trial showing that HGF angiogenic gene therapy can increase TcPO2 compared with placebo in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). The purpose of this randomized placebo controlled multi-center trial was to further assess the safety and clinical efficacy of a modified HGF gene delivery technique in patients with CLI and no revascularization options. Methods Patients with lower extremity ischemic tissue loss (Rutherford 5 and 6) received three sets of eight intramuscular injections every 2 weeks of HGF plasmid under duplex ultrasound guidance. Injection locations were individualized for each patient based on arteriographically defined vascular anatomy. Primary safety end point was incidence of adverse events (AE) or serious adverse events (SAE). Clinical end points included change from baseline in toe brachial index (TBI), rest pain assessment by a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS) as well as wound healing, amputation, and survival at 3 and 6 months. Results Randomization ratio was 3:1 HGF (n = 21) vs placebo (n = 6). Mean age was 76 ± 2 years, with 56{\%} male and 59{\%} diabetic. There was no difference in demographics between groups. There was no difference in AEs or SAEs, which consisted mostly of transient injection site discomfort, worsening of CLI, and intercurrent illnesses. Change in TBI significantly improved from baseline at 6 months in the HGF-treated group compared with placebo (0.05 ± 0.05 vs -0.17 ± 0.04; P = .047). Change in VAS from baseline at 6 months was also significantly improved in the HGF-treated group compared with placebo (-1.9 ± 1.3 vs +0.06 ± 0.2; P = .04). Complete ulcer healing at 12 months occurred in 31{\%} of the HGF group and 0{\%} of the placebo (P = .28) There was no difference in major amputation of the treated limb (HGF 29{\%} vs placebo 33{\%}) or mortality at 12 months (HGF 19{\%} vs placebo 17{\%}) between groups. Conclusion HGF gene therapy using a patient vascular anatomy specific delivery technique appears safe, maintained limb perfusion, and decreased rest pain in patients with CLI compared with placebo. A larger study to assess the efficacy of this therapy on more clinically relevant end points is warranted.",
author = "Powell, {Richard J.} and Phillip Goodney and Mendelsohn, {Farrell O.} and Moen, {Elaine K.} and Annex, {Brian H.}",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jvs.2010.07.044",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "1525--1530",
journal = "Journal of Vascular Surgery",
issn = "0741-5214",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Safety and efficacy of patient specific intramuscular injection of HGF plasmid gene therapy on limb perfusion and wound healing in patients with ischemic lower extremity ulceration

T2 - Results of the HGF-0205 trial

AU - Powell, Richard J.

AU - Goodney, Phillip

AU - Mendelsohn, Farrell O.

AU - Moen, Elaine K.

AU - Annex, Brian H.

PY - 2010/12/1

Y1 - 2010/12/1

N2 - Objectives We have previously reported the results of a dose-finding phase II trial showing that HGF angiogenic gene therapy can increase TcPO2 compared with placebo in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). The purpose of this randomized placebo controlled multi-center trial was to further assess the safety and clinical efficacy of a modified HGF gene delivery technique in patients with CLI and no revascularization options. Methods Patients with lower extremity ischemic tissue loss (Rutherford 5 and 6) received three sets of eight intramuscular injections every 2 weeks of HGF plasmid under duplex ultrasound guidance. Injection locations were individualized for each patient based on arteriographically defined vascular anatomy. Primary safety end point was incidence of adverse events (AE) or serious adverse events (SAE). Clinical end points included change from baseline in toe brachial index (TBI), rest pain assessment by a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS) as well as wound healing, amputation, and survival at 3 and 6 months. Results Randomization ratio was 3:1 HGF (n = 21) vs placebo (n = 6). Mean age was 76 ± 2 years, with 56% male and 59% diabetic. There was no difference in demographics between groups. There was no difference in AEs or SAEs, which consisted mostly of transient injection site discomfort, worsening of CLI, and intercurrent illnesses. Change in TBI significantly improved from baseline at 6 months in the HGF-treated group compared with placebo (0.05 ± 0.05 vs -0.17 ± 0.04; P = .047). Change in VAS from baseline at 6 months was also significantly improved in the HGF-treated group compared with placebo (-1.9 ± 1.3 vs +0.06 ± 0.2; P = .04). Complete ulcer healing at 12 months occurred in 31% of the HGF group and 0% of the placebo (P = .28) There was no difference in major amputation of the treated limb (HGF 29% vs placebo 33%) or mortality at 12 months (HGF 19% vs placebo 17%) between groups. Conclusion HGF gene therapy using a patient vascular anatomy specific delivery technique appears safe, maintained limb perfusion, and decreased rest pain in patients with CLI compared with placebo. A larger study to assess the efficacy of this therapy on more clinically relevant end points is warranted.

AB - Objectives We have previously reported the results of a dose-finding phase II trial showing that HGF angiogenic gene therapy can increase TcPO2 compared with placebo in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). The purpose of this randomized placebo controlled multi-center trial was to further assess the safety and clinical efficacy of a modified HGF gene delivery technique in patients with CLI and no revascularization options. Methods Patients with lower extremity ischemic tissue loss (Rutherford 5 and 6) received three sets of eight intramuscular injections every 2 weeks of HGF plasmid under duplex ultrasound guidance. Injection locations were individualized for each patient based on arteriographically defined vascular anatomy. Primary safety end point was incidence of adverse events (AE) or serious adverse events (SAE). Clinical end points included change from baseline in toe brachial index (TBI), rest pain assessment by a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS) as well as wound healing, amputation, and survival at 3 and 6 months. Results Randomization ratio was 3:1 HGF (n = 21) vs placebo (n = 6). Mean age was 76 ± 2 years, with 56% male and 59% diabetic. There was no difference in demographics between groups. There was no difference in AEs or SAEs, which consisted mostly of transient injection site discomfort, worsening of CLI, and intercurrent illnesses. Change in TBI significantly improved from baseline at 6 months in the HGF-treated group compared with placebo (0.05 ± 0.05 vs -0.17 ± 0.04; P = .047). Change in VAS from baseline at 6 months was also significantly improved in the HGF-treated group compared with placebo (-1.9 ± 1.3 vs +0.06 ± 0.2; P = .04). Complete ulcer healing at 12 months occurred in 31% of the HGF group and 0% of the placebo (P = .28) There was no difference in major amputation of the treated limb (HGF 29% vs placebo 33%) or mortality at 12 months (HGF 19% vs placebo 17%) between groups. Conclusion HGF gene therapy using a patient vascular anatomy specific delivery technique appears safe, maintained limb perfusion, and decreased rest pain in patients with CLI compared with placebo. A larger study to assess the efficacy of this therapy on more clinically relevant end points is warranted.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650184311&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650184311&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.07.044

DO - 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.07.044

M3 - Article

C2 - 21146749

AN - SCOPUS:78650184311

VL - 52

SP - 1525

EP - 1530

JO - Journal of Vascular Surgery

JF - Journal of Vascular Surgery

SN - 0741-5214

IS - 6

ER -