Should hilar lymph nodes be expected in radical nephrectomy specimens?

D. C. Phan, J. K. McKenney, R. M. Cox, Rabii Hussein Madi, G. F. Greene, N. Gokden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Lymph node (LN) status is essential in staging both renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and pelvic urothelial carcinoma (PUC). The rate of regional LN involvement is influenced by pathologic tumor stage, extent of the surgical resection, and accuracy of pathologic gross examination.In this study, we assess the presence of hilar LNs in radical nephrectomies (RN) by entirely submitting the hilar fat region (HFR) for microscopic evaluation (ME).Fifty consecutive RNs from 2006 to 2008 were evaluated by a standard gross examination protocol (SGEP) which consisted of palpation and sectioning of the HFR with submission of grossly identified LNs. Subsequently, the entire HFR was re-evaluated and submitted as study's total submission protocol (TSP). The number and disease status of hilar LNs identified by the SGEP and TSP were compared.Fifty RNs (37 clear cell RCC, 6 papillary RCC, 7 PUC) were studied prospectively. Ten of the 50 RNs had LNs identified (20%) with both protocols. Four of the 50 RNs had nodal metastases (8%) with the LN sizes ranging between 1.3 and 2.5. cm (mean 1.8. cm). All nodal metastases were identified by the SGEP. In three RNs (6%), additional minute (mean 0.12. cm) negative LNs not seen by the SGEP were identified by the TSP.LNs are present in only 20% of RNs, even after complete ME of the HFR. The SGEP for identifying hilar LNs in RNs is sufficient for staging and did not lead to underreporting of LN metastases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)310-313
Number of pages4
JournalPathology Research and Practice
Volume206
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Nephrectomy
Lymph Nodes
Fats
Renal Cell Carcinoma
Neoplasm Metastasis
Carcinoma
Palpation
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Hilar
  • Lymph node
  • Radical nephrectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Cell Biology

Cite this

Should hilar lymph nodes be expected in radical nephrectomy specimens? / Phan, D. C.; McKenney, J. K.; Cox, R. M.; Madi, Rabii Hussein; Greene, G. F.; Gokden, N.

In: Pathology Research and Practice, Vol. 206, No. 5, 01.05.2010, p. 310-313.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Phan, D. C. ; McKenney, J. K. ; Cox, R. M. ; Madi, Rabii Hussein ; Greene, G. F. ; Gokden, N. / Should hilar lymph nodes be expected in radical nephrectomy specimens?. In: Pathology Research and Practice. 2010 ; Vol. 206, No. 5. pp. 310-313.
@article{61b9fad98fe242f7a437a5b03a2f6007,
title = "Should hilar lymph nodes be expected in radical nephrectomy specimens?",
abstract = "Lymph node (LN) status is essential in staging both renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and pelvic urothelial carcinoma (PUC). The rate of regional LN involvement is influenced by pathologic tumor stage, extent of the surgical resection, and accuracy of pathologic gross examination.In this study, we assess the presence of hilar LNs in radical nephrectomies (RN) by entirely submitting the hilar fat region (HFR) for microscopic evaluation (ME).Fifty consecutive RNs from 2006 to 2008 were evaluated by a standard gross examination protocol (SGEP) which consisted of palpation and sectioning of the HFR with submission of grossly identified LNs. Subsequently, the entire HFR was re-evaluated and submitted as study's total submission protocol (TSP). The number and disease status of hilar LNs identified by the SGEP and TSP were compared.Fifty RNs (37 clear cell RCC, 6 papillary RCC, 7 PUC) were studied prospectively. Ten of the 50 RNs had LNs identified (20{\%}) with both protocols. Four of the 50 RNs had nodal metastases (8{\%}) with the LN sizes ranging between 1.3 and 2.5. cm (mean 1.8. cm). All nodal metastases were identified by the SGEP. In three RNs (6{\%}), additional minute (mean 0.12. cm) negative LNs not seen by the SGEP were identified by the TSP.LNs are present in only 20{\%} of RNs, even after complete ME of the HFR. The SGEP for identifying hilar LNs in RNs is sufficient for staging and did not lead to underreporting of LN metastases.",
keywords = "Hilar, Lymph node, Radical nephrectomy",
author = "Phan, {D. C.} and McKenney, {J. K.} and Cox, {R. M.} and Madi, {Rabii Hussein} and Greene, {G. F.} and N. Gokden",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.prp.2010.02.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "206",
pages = "310--313",
journal = "Pathology Research and Practice",
issn = "0344-0338",
publisher = "Urban und Fischer Verlag GmbH und Co. KG",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Should hilar lymph nodes be expected in radical nephrectomy specimens?

AU - Phan, D. C.

AU - McKenney, J. K.

AU - Cox, R. M.

AU - Madi, Rabii Hussein

AU - Greene, G. F.

AU - Gokden, N.

PY - 2010/5/1

Y1 - 2010/5/1

N2 - Lymph node (LN) status is essential in staging both renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and pelvic urothelial carcinoma (PUC). The rate of regional LN involvement is influenced by pathologic tumor stage, extent of the surgical resection, and accuracy of pathologic gross examination.In this study, we assess the presence of hilar LNs in radical nephrectomies (RN) by entirely submitting the hilar fat region (HFR) for microscopic evaluation (ME).Fifty consecutive RNs from 2006 to 2008 were evaluated by a standard gross examination protocol (SGEP) which consisted of palpation and sectioning of the HFR with submission of grossly identified LNs. Subsequently, the entire HFR was re-evaluated and submitted as study's total submission protocol (TSP). The number and disease status of hilar LNs identified by the SGEP and TSP were compared.Fifty RNs (37 clear cell RCC, 6 papillary RCC, 7 PUC) were studied prospectively. Ten of the 50 RNs had LNs identified (20%) with both protocols. Four of the 50 RNs had nodal metastases (8%) with the LN sizes ranging between 1.3 and 2.5. cm (mean 1.8. cm). All nodal metastases were identified by the SGEP. In three RNs (6%), additional minute (mean 0.12. cm) negative LNs not seen by the SGEP were identified by the TSP.LNs are present in only 20% of RNs, even after complete ME of the HFR. The SGEP for identifying hilar LNs in RNs is sufficient for staging and did not lead to underreporting of LN metastases.

AB - Lymph node (LN) status is essential in staging both renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and pelvic urothelial carcinoma (PUC). The rate of regional LN involvement is influenced by pathologic tumor stage, extent of the surgical resection, and accuracy of pathologic gross examination.In this study, we assess the presence of hilar LNs in radical nephrectomies (RN) by entirely submitting the hilar fat region (HFR) for microscopic evaluation (ME).Fifty consecutive RNs from 2006 to 2008 were evaluated by a standard gross examination protocol (SGEP) which consisted of palpation and sectioning of the HFR with submission of grossly identified LNs. Subsequently, the entire HFR was re-evaluated and submitted as study's total submission protocol (TSP). The number and disease status of hilar LNs identified by the SGEP and TSP were compared.Fifty RNs (37 clear cell RCC, 6 papillary RCC, 7 PUC) were studied prospectively. Ten of the 50 RNs had LNs identified (20%) with both protocols. Four of the 50 RNs had nodal metastases (8%) with the LN sizes ranging between 1.3 and 2.5. cm (mean 1.8. cm). All nodal metastases were identified by the SGEP. In three RNs (6%), additional minute (mean 0.12. cm) negative LNs not seen by the SGEP were identified by the TSP.LNs are present in only 20% of RNs, even after complete ME of the HFR. The SGEP for identifying hilar LNs in RNs is sufficient for staging and did not lead to underreporting of LN metastases.

KW - Hilar

KW - Lymph node

KW - Radical nephrectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952545747&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77952545747&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.prp.2010.02.002

DO - 10.1016/j.prp.2010.02.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 20189726

AN - SCOPUS:77952545747

VL - 206

SP - 310

EP - 313

JO - Pathology Research and Practice

JF - Pathology Research and Practice

SN - 0344-0338

IS - 5

ER -