Socioeconomic and Racial Predictors of Undergoing Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Selected Benign Diseases: Analysis of 341 487 Hysterectomies

Haim Arie Abenhaim, Ricardo Azziz, Jianfang Hu, Alfred Bartolucci, Togas Tulandi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Objective: Socioeconomic status and race are important determinants of health care access in the United States. The purpose of our study was to evaluate whether these factors influence use of laparoscopic hysterectomy for management of benign gynecologic diseases. Design: Retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). Setting: Data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 1998 to 2002. Patients: All records of women with primary discharge diagnosis of uterine leiomyomas or menorrhagia who underwent hysterectomy (laparoscopy or abdominal) were included in the study. Interventions: Race (Caucasian, African-American, Hispanic, or other), median household income (<$25 000, $25 000-$34 999, $35 000-$44 999, or ≥$45 000), and insurance status (private, Medicare, Medicaid, or other) were evaluated as determinants of laparoscopic surgical intervention. Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate likelihood of laparoscopic approach to hysterectomy. Measurements and Main Results: Of 341 487 records for hysterectomy, 295 857 were performed by abdominal and 45 630 by laparoscopic approach. In adjusted analyses, African-Americans, Hispanics, and other ethnicities were less likely to undergo laparoscopic hysterectomy; adjusted OR (95% CI): 0.44 (0.42-0.45), 0.58 (0.55-0.61), and 0.68 (0.64-0.72), respectively, as compared with Caucasians. As compared with women with median income of less than $25 000, laparoscopic approach was more commonly performed on women with median household income $25 000 to $34 999, 1.18 (1.10-1.26); $35 000 to $44 999, 1.13 (1.0-1.21); and $45 000 and above, 1.14 (1.06-1.22). As compared with women with Medicaid, laparoscopic approach was more likely to be performed on women with private insurance: 1.45 (1.42-1.62). Conclusion: In the United States, median household income, insurance status, and race appear to be important independent determinants of access to laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign diseases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)11-15
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008

Fingerprint

Hysterectomy
Insurance Coverage
Medicaid
Hispanic Americans
African Americans
Female Genital Diseases
Menorrhagia
Leiomyoma
Advisory Committees
Medicare
Insurance
Social Class
Health Care Costs
Laparoscopy
Inpatients
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Logistic Models
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • Abdominal hysterectomy
  • Hysterectomy
  • Income
  • Insurance
  • Laparoscopic hysterectomy
  • Laparoscopy
  • Race
  • Socioeconomy
  • Third-party payer
  • Vaginal hysterectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Socioeconomic and Racial Predictors of Undergoing Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Selected Benign Diseases : Analysis of 341 487 Hysterectomies. / Abenhaim, Haim Arie; Azziz, Ricardo; Hu, Jianfang; Bartolucci, Alfred; Tulandi, Togas.

In: Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, Vol. 15, No. 1, 01.01.2008, p. 11-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abenhaim, Haim Arie ; Azziz, Ricardo ; Hu, Jianfang ; Bartolucci, Alfred ; Tulandi, Togas. / Socioeconomic and Racial Predictors of Undergoing Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Selected Benign Diseases : Analysis of 341 487 Hysterectomies. In: Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2008 ; Vol. 15, No. 1. pp. 11-15.
@article{38b4eff24810401faf9fa2c87f9562b4,
title = "Socioeconomic and Racial Predictors of Undergoing Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Selected Benign Diseases: Analysis of 341 487 Hysterectomies",
abstract = "Study Objective: Socioeconomic status and race are important determinants of health care access in the United States. The purpose of our study was to evaluate whether these factors influence use of laparoscopic hysterectomy for management of benign gynecologic diseases. Design: Retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). Setting: Data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 1998 to 2002. Patients: All records of women with primary discharge diagnosis of uterine leiomyomas or menorrhagia who underwent hysterectomy (laparoscopy or abdominal) were included in the study. Interventions: Race (Caucasian, African-American, Hispanic, or other), median household income (<$25 000, $25 000-$34 999, $35 000-$44 999, or ≥$45 000), and insurance status (private, Medicare, Medicaid, or other) were evaluated as determinants of laparoscopic surgical intervention. Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate likelihood of laparoscopic approach to hysterectomy. Measurements and Main Results: Of 341 487 records for hysterectomy, 295 857 were performed by abdominal and 45 630 by laparoscopic approach. In adjusted analyses, African-Americans, Hispanics, and other ethnicities were less likely to undergo laparoscopic hysterectomy; adjusted OR (95{\%} CI): 0.44 (0.42-0.45), 0.58 (0.55-0.61), and 0.68 (0.64-0.72), respectively, as compared with Caucasians. As compared with women with median income of less than $25 000, laparoscopic approach was more commonly performed on women with median household income $25 000 to $34 999, 1.18 (1.10-1.26); $35 000 to $44 999, 1.13 (1.0-1.21); and $45 000 and above, 1.14 (1.06-1.22). As compared with women with Medicaid, laparoscopic approach was more likely to be performed on women with private insurance: 1.45 (1.42-1.62). Conclusion: In the United States, median household income, insurance status, and race appear to be important independent determinants of access to laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign diseases.",
keywords = "Abdominal hysterectomy, Hysterectomy, Income, Insurance, Laparoscopic hysterectomy, Laparoscopy, Race, Socioeconomy, Third-party payer, Vaginal hysterectomy",
author = "Abenhaim, {Haim Arie} and Ricardo Azziz and Jianfang Hu and Alfred Bartolucci and Togas Tulandi",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jmig.2007.07.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "11--15",
journal = "Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology",
issn = "1553-4650",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Socioeconomic and Racial Predictors of Undergoing Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Selected Benign Diseases

T2 - Analysis of 341 487 Hysterectomies

AU - Abenhaim, Haim Arie

AU - Azziz, Ricardo

AU - Hu, Jianfang

AU - Bartolucci, Alfred

AU - Tulandi, Togas

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - Study Objective: Socioeconomic status and race are important determinants of health care access in the United States. The purpose of our study was to evaluate whether these factors influence use of laparoscopic hysterectomy for management of benign gynecologic diseases. Design: Retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). Setting: Data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 1998 to 2002. Patients: All records of women with primary discharge diagnosis of uterine leiomyomas or menorrhagia who underwent hysterectomy (laparoscopy or abdominal) were included in the study. Interventions: Race (Caucasian, African-American, Hispanic, or other), median household income (<$25 000, $25 000-$34 999, $35 000-$44 999, or ≥$45 000), and insurance status (private, Medicare, Medicaid, or other) were evaluated as determinants of laparoscopic surgical intervention. Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate likelihood of laparoscopic approach to hysterectomy. Measurements and Main Results: Of 341 487 records for hysterectomy, 295 857 were performed by abdominal and 45 630 by laparoscopic approach. In adjusted analyses, African-Americans, Hispanics, and other ethnicities were less likely to undergo laparoscopic hysterectomy; adjusted OR (95% CI): 0.44 (0.42-0.45), 0.58 (0.55-0.61), and 0.68 (0.64-0.72), respectively, as compared with Caucasians. As compared with women with median income of less than $25 000, laparoscopic approach was more commonly performed on women with median household income $25 000 to $34 999, 1.18 (1.10-1.26); $35 000 to $44 999, 1.13 (1.0-1.21); and $45 000 and above, 1.14 (1.06-1.22). As compared with women with Medicaid, laparoscopic approach was more likely to be performed on women with private insurance: 1.45 (1.42-1.62). Conclusion: In the United States, median household income, insurance status, and race appear to be important independent determinants of access to laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign diseases.

AB - Study Objective: Socioeconomic status and race are important determinants of health care access in the United States. The purpose of our study was to evaluate whether these factors influence use of laparoscopic hysterectomy for management of benign gynecologic diseases. Design: Retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). Setting: Data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 1998 to 2002. Patients: All records of women with primary discharge diagnosis of uterine leiomyomas or menorrhagia who underwent hysterectomy (laparoscopy or abdominal) were included in the study. Interventions: Race (Caucasian, African-American, Hispanic, or other), median household income (<$25 000, $25 000-$34 999, $35 000-$44 999, or ≥$45 000), and insurance status (private, Medicare, Medicaid, or other) were evaluated as determinants of laparoscopic surgical intervention. Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate likelihood of laparoscopic approach to hysterectomy. Measurements and Main Results: Of 341 487 records for hysterectomy, 295 857 were performed by abdominal and 45 630 by laparoscopic approach. In adjusted analyses, African-Americans, Hispanics, and other ethnicities were less likely to undergo laparoscopic hysterectomy; adjusted OR (95% CI): 0.44 (0.42-0.45), 0.58 (0.55-0.61), and 0.68 (0.64-0.72), respectively, as compared with Caucasians. As compared with women with median income of less than $25 000, laparoscopic approach was more commonly performed on women with median household income $25 000 to $34 999, 1.18 (1.10-1.26); $35 000 to $44 999, 1.13 (1.0-1.21); and $45 000 and above, 1.14 (1.06-1.22). As compared with women with Medicaid, laparoscopic approach was more likely to be performed on women with private insurance: 1.45 (1.42-1.62). Conclusion: In the United States, median household income, insurance status, and race appear to be important independent determinants of access to laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign diseases.

KW - Abdominal hysterectomy

KW - Hysterectomy

KW - Income

KW - Insurance

KW - Laparoscopic hysterectomy

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - Race

KW - Socioeconomy

KW - Third-party payer

KW - Vaginal hysterectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38849151030&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38849151030&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.07.014

DO - 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.07.014

M3 - Article

C2 - 18262137

AN - SCOPUS:38849151030

VL - 15

SP - 11

EP - 15

JO - Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

JF - Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

SN - 1553-4650

IS - 1

ER -