Subtemporal Retrolabyrinthine (Posterior Petrosal) versus Endoscopic Endonasal Approach to the Petroclival Region: An Anatomical and Computed Tomography Study

Eric Mason, Jason Van Rompaey, C. Arturo Solares, Ramon Figueroa, Daniel Prevedello

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background?The petroclival region seats many neoplasms. Traditional surgical corridors to the region can result in unacceptable patient morbidity. The combined subtemporal retrolabyrinthine transpetrosal (posterior petrosal) approach provides adequate exposure with hearing preservation; however, the facial nerve and labyrinth are put at risk. Approaching the petroclival region with an endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) could minimize morbidity. Objective?To provide an anatomical and computed tomography (CT) comparison between the posterior petrosal approach and EEA to the petroclival region. Methods?The petroclival region was approached transclivally with EEA. Different aspects of dissection were compared with the posterior petrosal approach. The two approaches were also studied using CT analysis. Results?A successful corridor medial to the internal auditory canal (IAC) was achieved with EEA. Wide exposure was achieved with no external skin incisions, although significant sinonasal resection was required. The posterior petrosal was comparable in terms of exposure medially; however, the dissection involved more bone removal, greater skill, and a constricting effect upon deeper dissection. Importantly, access lateral to the IAC was obtained, whereas EEA could not reach this area. Conclusion?An EEA to the petroclival region is feasible. This approach can be considered in lesions medial to the IAC.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)231-237
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Neurological Surgery, Part B: Skull Base
Volume77
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2016

Fingerprint

Dissection
Tomography
Morbidity
Facial Nerve
Inner Ear
Hearing
Bone and Bones
Skin
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • combined subtemporal retrolabyrinthine transpetrosal
  • cranial base
  • endonasal
  • endoscopic
  • petroclival region
  • posterior petrosal
  • skull base surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Subtemporal Retrolabyrinthine (Posterior Petrosal) versus Endoscopic Endonasal Approach to the Petroclival Region : An Anatomical and Computed Tomography Study. / Mason, Eric; Rompaey, Jason Van; Solares, C. Arturo; Figueroa, Ramon; Prevedello, Daniel.

In: Journal of Neurological Surgery, Part B: Skull Base, Vol. 77, No. 3, 01.06.2016, p. 231-237.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f118720c343a4c9185086ccaca1b136e,
title = "Subtemporal Retrolabyrinthine (Posterior Petrosal) versus Endoscopic Endonasal Approach to the Petroclival Region: An Anatomical and Computed Tomography Study",
abstract = "Background?The petroclival region seats many neoplasms. Traditional surgical corridors to the region can result in unacceptable patient morbidity. The combined subtemporal retrolabyrinthine transpetrosal (posterior petrosal) approach provides adequate exposure with hearing preservation; however, the facial nerve and labyrinth are put at risk. Approaching the petroclival region with an endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) could minimize morbidity. Objective?To provide an anatomical and computed tomography (CT) comparison between the posterior petrosal approach and EEA to the petroclival region. Methods?The petroclival region was approached transclivally with EEA. Different aspects of dissection were compared with the posterior petrosal approach. The two approaches were also studied using CT analysis. Results?A successful corridor medial to the internal auditory canal (IAC) was achieved with EEA. Wide exposure was achieved with no external skin incisions, although significant sinonasal resection was required. The posterior petrosal was comparable in terms of exposure medially; however, the dissection involved more bone removal, greater skill, and a constricting effect upon deeper dissection. Importantly, access lateral to the IAC was obtained, whereas EEA could not reach this area. Conclusion?An EEA to the petroclival region is feasible. This approach can be considered in lesions medial to the IAC.",
keywords = "combined subtemporal retrolabyrinthine transpetrosal, cranial base, endonasal, endoscopic, petroclival region, posterior petrosal, skull base surgery",
author = "Eric Mason and Rompaey, {Jason Van} and Solares, {C. Arturo} and Ramon Figueroa and Daniel Prevedello",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1055/s-0035-1566123",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "77",
pages = "231--237",
journal = "Journal of Neurological Surgery, Part B: Skull Base",
issn = "2193-6331",
publisher = "Thieme Medical Publishers",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Subtemporal Retrolabyrinthine (Posterior Petrosal) versus Endoscopic Endonasal Approach to the Petroclival Region

T2 - An Anatomical and Computed Tomography Study

AU - Mason, Eric

AU - Rompaey, Jason Van

AU - Solares, C. Arturo

AU - Figueroa, Ramon

AU - Prevedello, Daniel

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - Background?The petroclival region seats many neoplasms. Traditional surgical corridors to the region can result in unacceptable patient morbidity. The combined subtemporal retrolabyrinthine transpetrosal (posterior petrosal) approach provides adequate exposure with hearing preservation; however, the facial nerve and labyrinth are put at risk. Approaching the petroclival region with an endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) could minimize morbidity. Objective?To provide an anatomical and computed tomography (CT) comparison between the posterior petrosal approach and EEA to the petroclival region. Methods?The petroclival region was approached transclivally with EEA. Different aspects of dissection were compared with the posterior petrosal approach. The two approaches were also studied using CT analysis. Results?A successful corridor medial to the internal auditory canal (IAC) was achieved with EEA. Wide exposure was achieved with no external skin incisions, although significant sinonasal resection was required. The posterior petrosal was comparable in terms of exposure medially; however, the dissection involved more bone removal, greater skill, and a constricting effect upon deeper dissection. Importantly, access lateral to the IAC was obtained, whereas EEA could not reach this area. Conclusion?An EEA to the petroclival region is feasible. This approach can be considered in lesions medial to the IAC.

AB - Background?The petroclival region seats many neoplasms. Traditional surgical corridors to the region can result in unacceptable patient morbidity. The combined subtemporal retrolabyrinthine transpetrosal (posterior petrosal) approach provides adequate exposure with hearing preservation; however, the facial nerve and labyrinth are put at risk. Approaching the petroclival region with an endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) could minimize morbidity. Objective?To provide an anatomical and computed tomography (CT) comparison between the posterior petrosal approach and EEA to the petroclival region. Methods?The petroclival region was approached transclivally with EEA. Different aspects of dissection were compared with the posterior petrosal approach. The two approaches were also studied using CT analysis. Results?A successful corridor medial to the internal auditory canal (IAC) was achieved with EEA. Wide exposure was achieved with no external skin incisions, although significant sinonasal resection was required. The posterior petrosal was comparable in terms of exposure medially; however, the dissection involved more bone removal, greater skill, and a constricting effect upon deeper dissection. Importantly, access lateral to the IAC was obtained, whereas EEA could not reach this area. Conclusion?An EEA to the petroclival region is feasible. This approach can be considered in lesions medial to the IAC.

KW - combined subtemporal retrolabyrinthine transpetrosal

KW - cranial base

KW - endonasal

KW - endoscopic

KW - petroclival region

KW - posterior petrosal

KW - skull base surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945581975&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945581975&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-0035-1566123

DO - 10.1055/s-0035-1566123

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84945581975

VL - 77

SP - 231

EP - 237

JO - Journal of Neurological Surgery, Part B: Skull Base

JF - Journal of Neurological Surgery, Part B: Skull Base

SN - 2193-6331

IS - 3

ER -