18F protection issues: Human and γ-camera considerations

ZongJian Cao, James H. Corley, Jerry Allison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Two main issues in protecting radiation workers and the general public from 18F radiation - distance from and lead shielding for an 18F source-were investigated. We also examined the effect of an 18F source on the counting rate of a neighboring γ-camera. Methods: The dose rates of an 18F vial and a water-filled cylinder were measured using an ionization chamber at different distances with or without lead shielding. In addition, the counting rates of γ-cameras in the presence of the 18F cylinder were measured with different detector orientations, distances, and energy windows. Results: The dose rate of a point or an extended source in air was proportional to the inverse square of the distance from the source. At 2 m, the dose rate for a 370-MBq 18F source was less than 20 μGy in any single hour, which is the limit for unrestricted areas. The dose rate with 0.318-cm-thick lead shielding decreased to about 60%, and that with 5.08-cm-thick lead shielding decreased to about 4%; these rates were higher than those estimated using the narrow-beam attenuation formula. The scattered photons and characteristic x-rays from the lead brick and surrounding structures may have contributed to this result. The decrease in dose rate resulting from a 33% increase in distance was similar to the effect from shielding the source with 0.318-cm-thick lead. At 3 m from a 185-MBq 18F source, the counting rate in the 99mTc window of an Orbiter camera was about 120,000/min when the detector faced the source. This rate was comparable to that of a typical 99mTc clinical study (∼200,000/min). Only when the distance was increased to 11 m and the detector did not face the source did the counting rate decrease to the background level (3,234/min). The counting rate also depended on the energy window of the γ-camera. On a Vertex camera, the counting rate of 18F in the 99mTc window versus that in the 201Tl (or 67Ga) window was 1:1.7 (or 1:2.7). Conclusion: 18F dose rate can be significantly reduced with distance. Lead shielding is not as effective as was predicted. 18F sources should be kept substantial distances away from γ-cameras to avoid contamination of image quality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)210-215
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Volume31
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 1 2003

Fingerprint

Radiation
Photons
Lead
Air
X-Rays
Water
Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • Counting rate
  • Dose rate
  • F
  • Lead shielding
  • γ-camera

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

18F protection issues : Human and γ-camera considerations. / Cao, ZongJian; Corley, James H.; Allison, Jerry.

In: Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology, Vol. 31, No. 4, 01.12.2003, p. 210-215.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cao, ZongJian ; Corley, James H. ; Allison, Jerry. / 18F protection issues : Human and γ-camera considerations. In: Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology. 2003 ; Vol. 31, No. 4. pp. 210-215.
@article{179f343d86694c5a970d111df663a641,
title = "18F protection issues: Human and γ-camera considerations",
abstract = "Objective: Two main issues in protecting radiation workers and the general public from 18F radiation - distance from and lead shielding for an 18F source-were investigated. We also examined the effect of an 18F source on the counting rate of a neighboring γ-camera. Methods: The dose rates of an 18F vial and a water-filled cylinder were measured using an ionization chamber at different distances with or without lead shielding. In addition, the counting rates of γ-cameras in the presence of the 18F cylinder were measured with different detector orientations, distances, and energy windows. Results: The dose rate of a point or an extended source in air was proportional to the inverse square of the distance from the source. At 2 m, the dose rate for a 370-MBq 18F source was less than 20 μGy in any single hour, which is the limit for unrestricted areas. The dose rate with 0.318-cm-thick lead shielding decreased to about 60{\%}, and that with 5.08-cm-thick lead shielding decreased to about 4{\%}; these rates were higher than those estimated using the narrow-beam attenuation formula. The scattered photons and characteristic x-rays from the lead brick and surrounding structures may have contributed to this result. The decrease in dose rate resulting from a 33{\%} increase in distance was similar to the effect from shielding the source with 0.318-cm-thick lead. At 3 m from a 185-MBq 18F source, the counting rate in the 99mTc window of an Orbiter camera was about 120,000/min when the detector faced the source. This rate was comparable to that of a typical 99mTc clinical study (∼200,000/min). Only when the distance was increased to 11 m and the detector did not face the source did the counting rate decrease to the background level (3,234/min). The counting rate also depended on the energy window of the γ-camera. On a Vertex camera, the counting rate of 18F in the 99mTc window versus that in the 201Tl (or 67Ga) window was 1:1.7 (or 1:2.7). Conclusion: 18F dose rate can be significantly reduced with distance. Lead shielding is not as effective as was predicted. 18F sources should be kept substantial distances away from γ-cameras to avoid contamination of image quality.",
keywords = "Counting rate, Dose rate, F, Lead shielding, γ-camera",
author = "ZongJian Cao and Corley, {James H.} and Jerry Allison",
year = "2003",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "210--215",
journal = "Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology",
issn = "0091-4916",
publisher = "Society of Nuclear Medicine Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 18F protection issues

T2 - Human and γ-camera considerations

AU - Cao, ZongJian

AU - Corley, James H.

AU - Allison, Jerry

PY - 2003/12/1

Y1 - 2003/12/1

N2 - Objective: Two main issues in protecting radiation workers and the general public from 18F radiation - distance from and lead shielding for an 18F source-were investigated. We also examined the effect of an 18F source on the counting rate of a neighboring γ-camera. Methods: The dose rates of an 18F vial and a water-filled cylinder were measured using an ionization chamber at different distances with or without lead shielding. In addition, the counting rates of γ-cameras in the presence of the 18F cylinder were measured with different detector orientations, distances, and energy windows. Results: The dose rate of a point or an extended source in air was proportional to the inverse square of the distance from the source. At 2 m, the dose rate for a 370-MBq 18F source was less than 20 μGy in any single hour, which is the limit for unrestricted areas. The dose rate with 0.318-cm-thick lead shielding decreased to about 60%, and that with 5.08-cm-thick lead shielding decreased to about 4%; these rates were higher than those estimated using the narrow-beam attenuation formula. The scattered photons and characteristic x-rays from the lead brick and surrounding structures may have contributed to this result. The decrease in dose rate resulting from a 33% increase in distance was similar to the effect from shielding the source with 0.318-cm-thick lead. At 3 m from a 185-MBq 18F source, the counting rate in the 99mTc window of an Orbiter camera was about 120,000/min when the detector faced the source. This rate was comparable to that of a typical 99mTc clinical study (∼200,000/min). Only when the distance was increased to 11 m and the detector did not face the source did the counting rate decrease to the background level (3,234/min). The counting rate also depended on the energy window of the γ-camera. On a Vertex camera, the counting rate of 18F in the 99mTc window versus that in the 201Tl (or 67Ga) window was 1:1.7 (or 1:2.7). Conclusion: 18F dose rate can be significantly reduced with distance. Lead shielding is not as effective as was predicted. 18F sources should be kept substantial distances away from γ-cameras to avoid contamination of image quality.

AB - Objective: Two main issues in protecting radiation workers and the general public from 18F radiation - distance from and lead shielding for an 18F source-were investigated. We also examined the effect of an 18F source on the counting rate of a neighboring γ-camera. Methods: The dose rates of an 18F vial and a water-filled cylinder were measured using an ionization chamber at different distances with or without lead shielding. In addition, the counting rates of γ-cameras in the presence of the 18F cylinder were measured with different detector orientations, distances, and energy windows. Results: The dose rate of a point or an extended source in air was proportional to the inverse square of the distance from the source. At 2 m, the dose rate for a 370-MBq 18F source was less than 20 μGy in any single hour, which is the limit for unrestricted areas. The dose rate with 0.318-cm-thick lead shielding decreased to about 60%, and that with 5.08-cm-thick lead shielding decreased to about 4%; these rates were higher than those estimated using the narrow-beam attenuation formula. The scattered photons and characteristic x-rays from the lead brick and surrounding structures may have contributed to this result. The decrease in dose rate resulting from a 33% increase in distance was similar to the effect from shielding the source with 0.318-cm-thick lead. At 3 m from a 185-MBq 18F source, the counting rate in the 99mTc window of an Orbiter camera was about 120,000/min when the detector faced the source. This rate was comparable to that of a typical 99mTc clinical study (∼200,000/min). Only when the distance was increased to 11 m and the detector did not face the source did the counting rate decrease to the background level (3,234/min). The counting rate also depended on the energy window of the γ-camera. On a Vertex camera, the counting rate of 18F in the 99mTc window versus that in the 201Tl (or 67Ga) window was 1:1.7 (or 1:2.7). Conclusion: 18F dose rate can be significantly reduced with distance. Lead shielding is not as effective as was predicted. 18F sources should be kept substantial distances away from γ-cameras to avoid contamination of image quality.

KW - Counting rate

KW - Dose rate

KW - F

KW - Lead shielding

KW - γ-camera

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2342632680&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2342632680&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 14657287

AN - SCOPUS:2342632680

VL - 31

SP - 210

EP - 215

JO - Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

JF - Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

SN - 0091-4916

IS - 4

ER -