The Availability and Utility of Services to Address Risk Factors for Recidivism Among Justice-Involved Veterans

Daniel M. Blonigen, Allison L. Rodriguez, Luisa Manfredi, Jessica Yvonne Britt, Andrea Nevedal, Andrea K. Finlay, Joel Rosenthal, David Smelson, Christine Timko

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The availability and utility of services to address recidivism risk factors among justice-involved veterans is unknown. We explored these issues through qualitative interviews with 63 Specialists from the Department of Veterans Affairs’ (VA) Veterans Justice Programs. To guide the interviews, we utilized the risk–need–responsivity (RNR) model of offender rehabilitation. Specialists reported that justice-involved veterans generally have access to services to address most RNR-based risk factors (substance abuse, lack of positive school/work involvement, family/marital dysfunction, lack of prosocial activities/interests), but have less access to services targeting risk factors of antisocial tendencies and associates and empirically based treatments for recidivism in VA. Peer-based services, motivational interviewing/cognitive-behavioral therapy, and Veterans Treatment Courts were perceived as useful to address multiple risk factors. These findings highlight potential gaps in provision of evidence-based care to address recidivism among justice-involved veterans, as well as promising policy-based solutions that may have widespread impact on reducing recidivism in this population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)790-813
Number of pages24
JournalCriminal Justice Policy Review
Volume28
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

justice
lack
qualitative interview
substance abuse
rehabilitation
offender
interview
school
evidence

Keywords

  • empirically based treatments
  • justice-involved veterans
  • recidivism
  • risk–need–responsivity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Cite this

The Availability and Utility of Services to Address Risk Factors for Recidivism Among Justice-Involved Veterans. / Blonigen, Daniel M.; Rodriguez, Allison L.; Manfredi, Luisa; Britt, Jessica Yvonne; Nevedal, Andrea; Finlay, Andrea K.; Rosenthal, Joel; Smelson, David; Timko, Christine.

In: Criminal Justice Policy Review, Vol. 28, No. 8, 01.10.2017, p. 790-813.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Blonigen, DM, Rodriguez, AL, Manfredi, L, Britt, JY, Nevedal, A, Finlay, AK, Rosenthal, J, Smelson, D & Timko, C 2017, 'The Availability and Utility of Services to Address Risk Factors for Recidivism Among Justice-Involved Veterans', Criminal Justice Policy Review, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 790-813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403416628601
Blonigen, Daniel M. ; Rodriguez, Allison L. ; Manfredi, Luisa ; Britt, Jessica Yvonne ; Nevedal, Andrea ; Finlay, Andrea K. ; Rosenthal, Joel ; Smelson, David ; Timko, Christine. / The Availability and Utility of Services to Address Risk Factors for Recidivism Among Justice-Involved Veterans. In: Criminal Justice Policy Review. 2017 ; Vol. 28, No. 8. pp. 790-813.
@article{fe89e973b2d7442aa36c248d2b906436,
title = "The Availability and Utility of Services to Address Risk Factors for Recidivism Among Justice-Involved Veterans",
abstract = "The availability and utility of services to address recidivism risk factors among justice-involved veterans is unknown. We explored these issues through qualitative interviews with 63 Specialists from the Department of Veterans Affairs’ (VA) Veterans Justice Programs. To guide the interviews, we utilized the risk–need–responsivity (RNR) model of offender rehabilitation. Specialists reported that justice-involved veterans generally have access to services to address most RNR-based risk factors (substance abuse, lack of positive school/work involvement, family/marital dysfunction, lack of prosocial activities/interests), but have less access to services targeting risk factors of antisocial tendencies and associates and empirically based treatments for recidivism in VA. Peer-based services, motivational interviewing/cognitive-behavioral therapy, and Veterans Treatment Courts were perceived as useful to address multiple risk factors. These findings highlight potential gaps in provision of evidence-based care to address recidivism among justice-involved veterans, as well as promising policy-based solutions that may have widespread impact on reducing recidivism in this population.",
keywords = "empirically based treatments, justice-involved veterans, recidivism, risk–need–responsivity",
author = "Blonigen, {Daniel M.} and Rodriguez, {Allison L.} and Luisa Manfredi and Britt, {Jessica Yvonne} and Andrea Nevedal and Finlay, {Andrea K.} and Joel Rosenthal and David Smelson and Christine Timko",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0887403416628601",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "790--813",
journal = "Criminal Justice Policy Review",
issn = "0887-4034",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Availability and Utility of Services to Address Risk Factors for Recidivism Among Justice-Involved Veterans

AU - Blonigen, Daniel M.

AU - Rodriguez, Allison L.

AU - Manfredi, Luisa

AU - Britt, Jessica Yvonne

AU - Nevedal, Andrea

AU - Finlay, Andrea K.

AU - Rosenthal, Joel

AU - Smelson, David

AU - Timko, Christine

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - The availability and utility of services to address recidivism risk factors among justice-involved veterans is unknown. We explored these issues through qualitative interviews with 63 Specialists from the Department of Veterans Affairs’ (VA) Veterans Justice Programs. To guide the interviews, we utilized the risk–need–responsivity (RNR) model of offender rehabilitation. Specialists reported that justice-involved veterans generally have access to services to address most RNR-based risk factors (substance abuse, lack of positive school/work involvement, family/marital dysfunction, lack of prosocial activities/interests), but have less access to services targeting risk factors of antisocial tendencies and associates and empirically based treatments for recidivism in VA. Peer-based services, motivational interviewing/cognitive-behavioral therapy, and Veterans Treatment Courts were perceived as useful to address multiple risk factors. These findings highlight potential gaps in provision of evidence-based care to address recidivism among justice-involved veterans, as well as promising policy-based solutions that may have widespread impact on reducing recidivism in this population.

AB - The availability and utility of services to address recidivism risk factors among justice-involved veterans is unknown. We explored these issues through qualitative interviews with 63 Specialists from the Department of Veterans Affairs’ (VA) Veterans Justice Programs. To guide the interviews, we utilized the risk–need–responsivity (RNR) model of offender rehabilitation. Specialists reported that justice-involved veterans generally have access to services to address most RNR-based risk factors (substance abuse, lack of positive school/work involvement, family/marital dysfunction, lack of prosocial activities/interests), but have less access to services targeting risk factors of antisocial tendencies and associates and empirically based treatments for recidivism in VA. Peer-based services, motivational interviewing/cognitive-behavioral therapy, and Veterans Treatment Courts were perceived as useful to address multiple risk factors. These findings highlight potential gaps in provision of evidence-based care to address recidivism among justice-involved veterans, as well as promising policy-based solutions that may have widespread impact on reducing recidivism in this population.

KW - empirically based treatments

KW - justice-involved veterans

KW - recidivism

KW - risk–need–responsivity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028662338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028662338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0887403416628601

DO - 10.1177/0887403416628601

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 790

EP - 813

JO - Criminal Justice Policy Review

JF - Criminal Justice Policy Review

SN - 0887-4034

IS - 8

ER -