The Clinical Value of Computerized Information Services a Review of 98 Randomized Clinical Trials

E Andrew Balas, Suzanne M. Austin, Joyce A. Mitchell, Bernard G. Ewigman, Kenneth D. Bopp, Gordon D. Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

156 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To review all randomized clinical trials addressing the efficacy of clinical information systems and to determine the clinical settings, types of interventions, and effects studied. Data Sources: Extensive and systematic MEDLINE searches were conducted using a combination of medical subject headings (MeSH) and textword terms to collect trial reports. Manual searches of books and monographs as well as informal contacts were also used. Study Selection: The eligibility criteria were (1) randomized controlled clinical trial, (2) computerized information intervention in the study group, and (3) effect measured on the process or outcome of care. Data Extraction: Two research assistants independently abstracted from the selected reports the following structured information: trial sites, computerized interventions, effect variables, and outcomes. Three investigators evaluated the combined list of trial features for setting, intervention, and effect. The statistical analysis included an evaluation of agreement in developing classifications and an analysis of the ratio of positive trial outcomes. Data Synthesis: Most information services were tested in outpatient care (82%), particularly in primary care (66%). The information intervention targeted the provider in 64% of the trials. The effect was primarily measured for the process of care (76%). Provider prompt/reminder, computer-assisted treatment planner, interactive patient education/ therapy, and patient prompt/reminder were significantly successful interventions (sign test, P<.05). Conclusions: Randomized clinical trials confirm that four generic information interventions are active ingredients of computer systems and can make a significant difference in family medicine (physician and patient reminders, treatment planner, and patient education). To manage care and improve quality, primary care computer systems should incorporate these effective information services.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)271-278
Number of pages8
JournalArchives of Family Medicine
Volume5
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Information Services
Patient Education
Randomized Controlled Trials
Computer Systems
Primary Health Care
Medical Subject Headings
Quality of Health Care
Information Storage and Retrieval
Family Physicians
Ambulatory Care
Information Systems
MEDLINE
Therapeutics
Research Personnel
Medicine
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

The Clinical Value of Computerized Information Services a Review of 98 Randomized Clinical Trials. / Balas, E Andrew; Austin, Suzanne M.; Mitchell, Joyce A.; Ewigman, Bernard G.; Bopp, Kenneth D.; Brown, Gordon D.

In: Archives of Family Medicine, Vol. 5, No. 5, 01.01.1996, p. 271-278.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Balas, E Andrew ; Austin, Suzanne M. ; Mitchell, Joyce A. ; Ewigman, Bernard G. ; Bopp, Kenneth D. ; Brown, Gordon D. / The Clinical Value of Computerized Information Services a Review of 98 Randomized Clinical Trials. In: Archives of Family Medicine. 1996 ; Vol. 5, No. 5. pp. 271-278.
@article{0ff51825f1d24551840c016e48ce12ab,
title = "The Clinical Value of Computerized Information Services a Review of 98 Randomized Clinical Trials",
abstract = "Objective: To review all randomized clinical trials addressing the efficacy of clinical information systems and to determine the clinical settings, types of interventions, and effects studied. Data Sources: Extensive and systematic MEDLINE searches were conducted using a combination of medical subject headings (MeSH) and textword terms to collect trial reports. Manual searches of books and monographs as well as informal contacts were also used. Study Selection: The eligibility criteria were (1) randomized controlled clinical trial, (2) computerized information intervention in the study group, and (3) effect measured on the process or outcome of care. Data Extraction: Two research assistants independently abstracted from the selected reports the following structured information: trial sites, computerized interventions, effect variables, and outcomes. Three investigators evaluated the combined list of trial features for setting, intervention, and effect. The statistical analysis included an evaluation of agreement in developing classifications and an analysis of the ratio of positive trial outcomes. Data Synthesis: Most information services were tested in outpatient care (82{\%}), particularly in primary care (66{\%}). The information intervention targeted the provider in 64{\%} of the trials. The effect was primarily measured for the process of care (76{\%}). Provider prompt/reminder, computer-assisted treatment planner, interactive patient education/ therapy, and patient prompt/reminder were significantly successful interventions (sign test, P<.05). Conclusions: Randomized clinical trials confirm that four generic information interventions are active ingredients of computer systems and can make a significant difference in family medicine (physician and patient reminders, treatment planner, and patient education). To manage care and improve quality, primary care computer systems should incorporate these effective information services.",
author = "Balas, {E Andrew} and Austin, {Suzanne M.} and Mitchell, {Joyce A.} and Ewigman, {Bernard G.} and Bopp, {Kenneth D.} and Brown, {Gordon D.}",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/archfami.5.5.271",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "271--278",
journal = "Archives of Family Medicine",
issn = "1063-3987",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Clinical Value of Computerized Information Services a Review of 98 Randomized Clinical Trials

AU - Balas, E Andrew

AU - Austin, Suzanne M.

AU - Mitchell, Joyce A.

AU - Ewigman, Bernard G.

AU - Bopp, Kenneth D.

AU - Brown, Gordon D.

PY - 1996/1/1

Y1 - 1996/1/1

N2 - Objective: To review all randomized clinical trials addressing the efficacy of clinical information systems and to determine the clinical settings, types of interventions, and effects studied. Data Sources: Extensive and systematic MEDLINE searches were conducted using a combination of medical subject headings (MeSH) and textword terms to collect trial reports. Manual searches of books and monographs as well as informal contacts were also used. Study Selection: The eligibility criteria were (1) randomized controlled clinical trial, (2) computerized information intervention in the study group, and (3) effect measured on the process or outcome of care. Data Extraction: Two research assistants independently abstracted from the selected reports the following structured information: trial sites, computerized interventions, effect variables, and outcomes. Three investigators evaluated the combined list of trial features for setting, intervention, and effect. The statistical analysis included an evaluation of agreement in developing classifications and an analysis of the ratio of positive trial outcomes. Data Synthesis: Most information services were tested in outpatient care (82%), particularly in primary care (66%). The information intervention targeted the provider in 64% of the trials. The effect was primarily measured for the process of care (76%). Provider prompt/reminder, computer-assisted treatment planner, interactive patient education/ therapy, and patient prompt/reminder were significantly successful interventions (sign test, P<.05). Conclusions: Randomized clinical trials confirm that four generic information interventions are active ingredients of computer systems and can make a significant difference in family medicine (physician and patient reminders, treatment planner, and patient education). To manage care and improve quality, primary care computer systems should incorporate these effective information services.

AB - Objective: To review all randomized clinical trials addressing the efficacy of clinical information systems and to determine the clinical settings, types of interventions, and effects studied. Data Sources: Extensive and systematic MEDLINE searches were conducted using a combination of medical subject headings (MeSH) and textword terms to collect trial reports. Manual searches of books and monographs as well as informal contacts were also used. Study Selection: The eligibility criteria were (1) randomized controlled clinical trial, (2) computerized information intervention in the study group, and (3) effect measured on the process or outcome of care. Data Extraction: Two research assistants independently abstracted from the selected reports the following structured information: trial sites, computerized interventions, effect variables, and outcomes. Three investigators evaluated the combined list of trial features for setting, intervention, and effect. The statistical analysis included an evaluation of agreement in developing classifications and an analysis of the ratio of positive trial outcomes. Data Synthesis: Most information services were tested in outpatient care (82%), particularly in primary care (66%). The information intervention targeted the provider in 64% of the trials. The effect was primarily measured for the process of care (76%). Provider prompt/reminder, computer-assisted treatment planner, interactive patient education/ therapy, and patient prompt/reminder were significantly successful interventions (sign test, P<.05). Conclusions: Randomized clinical trials confirm that four generic information interventions are active ingredients of computer systems and can make a significant difference in family medicine (physician and patient reminders, treatment planner, and patient education). To manage care and improve quality, primary care computer systems should incorporate these effective information services.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030137968&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030137968&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archfami.5.5.271

DO - 10.1001/archfami.5.5.271

M3 - Article

C2 - 8620266

AN - SCOPUS:0030137968

VL - 5

SP - 271

EP - 278

JO - Archives of Family Medicine

JF - Archives of Family Medicine

SN - 1063-3987

IS - 5

ER -