The Eden Alternative: Findings after 1 year of implementation

Mary Thoesen Coleman, Stephen Looney, James O'Brien, Craig Ziegler, Cynthia A. Pastorino, Carolyn Turner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

70 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. This study examines the effects of the Eden Alternative (EA), a systematic introduction of pets, plants, and children into a nursing home, on the quality of life of nursing home residents. Methods. Two nursing homes run by the same organization participated. The study site began implementing the EA in November 1998. The control site continued traditional care. Patient-level data from the Minimum Data Set (MDS), Version 2.0, and aggregate data based on staff reports were used to compare the residents at the two sites in terms of cognition, survival, immune function, functional status, and cost of care after 1 year. Results. After adjusting for baseline differences, follow-up MDS data indicated that the Eden site had significantly greater proportions of residents who had fallen within the past 30 days (p = .011) and residents who were experiencing nutritional problems (p < .001). Staff report data indicated that, during the study period, the Eden site had significantly higher rates of residents requiring skilled nursing and hypnotic prescriptions, and more staff terminations and new hires. The control site had significantly higher rates of residents requiring anxiolytic prescriptions. Conclusions. The findings from this study indicate no beneficial effects of the EA in terms of cognition, functional status, survival, infection rate, or cost of care after 1 year. However, qualitative observations at the Eden site indicated that the change was positive for many staff as well as residents, suggesting that it may take longer than a year to demonstrate improvements attributable to the EA.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)M422-M427
JournalJournals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Volume57
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002

Fingerprint

Nursing Homes
Cognition
Prescriptions
Costs and Cost Analysis
Pets
Anti-Anxiety Agents
Hypnotics and Sedatives
Nursing
Survival Rate
Quality of Life
Organizations
Survival
Infection
Datasets

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aging
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

The Eden Alternative : Findings after 1 year of implementation. / Coleman, Mary Thoesen; Looney, Stephen; O'Brien, James; Ziegler, Craig; Pastorino, Cynthia A.; Turner, Carolyn.

In: Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, Vol. 57, No. 7, 01.01.2002, p. M422-M427.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Coleman, Mary Thoesen ; Looney, Stephen ; O'Brien, James ; Ziegler, Craig ; Pastorino, Cynthia A. ; Turner, Carolyn. / The Eden Alternative : Findings after 1 year of implementation. In: Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2002 ; Vol. 57, No. 7. pp. M422-M427.
@article{d1357a5931004f26b191c584614c1edb,
title = "The Eden Alternative: Findings after 1 year of implementation",
abstract = "Background. This study examines the effects of the Eden Alternative (EA), a systematic introduction of pets, plants, and children into a nursing home, on the quality of life of nursing home residents. Methods. Two nursing homes run by the same organization participated. The study site began implementing the EA in November 1998. The control site continued traditional care. Patient-level data from the Minimum Data Set (MDS), Version 2.0, and aggregate data based on staff reports were used to compare the residents at the two sites in terms of cognition, survival, immune function, functional status, and cost of care after 1 year. Results. After adjusting for baseline differences, follow-up MDS data indicated that the Eden site had significantly greater proportions of residents who had fallen within the past 30 days (p = .011) and residents who were experiencing nutritional problems (p < .001). Staff report data indicated that, during the study period, the Eden site had significantly higher rates of residents requiring skilled nursing and hypnotic prescriptions, and more staff terminations and new hires. The control site had significantly higher rates of residents requiring anxiolytic prescriptions. Conclusions. The findings from this study indicate no beneficial effects of the EA in terms of cognition, functional status, survival, infection rate, or cost of care after 1 year. However, qualitative observations at the Eden site indicated that the change was positive for many staff as well as residents, suggesting that it may take longer than a year to demonstrate improvements attributable to the EA.",
author = "Coleman, {Mary Thoesen} and Stephen Looney and James O'Brien and Craig Ziegler and Pastorino, {Cynthia A.} and Carolyn Turner",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/gerona/57.7.M422",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "57",
pages = "M422--M427",
journal = "Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences",
issn = "1079-5006",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Eden Alternative

T2 - Findings after 1 year of implementation

AU - Coleman, Mary Thoesen

AU - Looney, Stephen

AU - O'Brien, James

AU - Ziegler, Craig

AU - Pastorino, Cynthia A.

AU - Turner, Carolyn

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - Background. This study examines the effects of the Eden Alternative (EA), a systematic introduction of pets, plants, and children into a nursing home, on the quality of life of nursing home residents. Methods. Two nursing homes run by the same organization participated. The study site began implementing the EA in November 1998. The control site continued traditional care. Patient-level data from the Minimum Data Set (MDS), Version 2.0, and aggregate data based on staff reports were used to compare the residents at the two sites in terms of cognition, survival, immune function, functional status, and cost of care after 1 year. Results. After adjusting for baseline differences, follow-up MDS data indicated that the Eden site had significantly greater proportions of residents who had fallen within the past 30 days (p = .011) and residents who were experiencing nutritional problems (p < .001). Staff report data indicated that, during the study period, the Eden site had significantly higher rates of residents requiring skilled nursing and hypnotic prescriptions, and more staff terminations and new hires. The control site had significantly higher rates of residents requiring anxiolytic prescriptions. Conclusions. The findings from this study indicate no beneficial effects of the EA in terms of cognition, functional status, survival, infection rate, or cost of care after 1 year. However, qualitative observations at the Eden site indicated that the change was positive for many staff as well as residents, suggesting that it may take longer than a year to demonstrate improvements attributable to the EA.

AB - Background. This study examines the effects of the Eden Alternative (EA), a systematic introduction of pets, plants, and children into a nursing home, on the quality of life of nursing home residents. Methods. Two nursing homes run by the same organization participated. The study site began implementing the EA in November 1998. The control site continued traditional care. Patient-level data from the Minimum Data Set (MDS), Version 2.0, and aggregate data based on staff reports were used to compare the residents at the two sites in terms of cognition, survival, immune function, functional status, and cost of care after 1 year. Results. After adjusting for baseline differences, follow-up MDS data indicated that the Eden site had significantly greater proportions of residents who had fallen within the past 30 days (p = .011) and residents who were experiencing nutritional problems (p < .001). Staff report data indicated that, during the study period, the Eden site had significantly higher rates of residents requiring skilled nursing and hypnotic prescriptions, and more staff terminations and new hires. The control site had significantly higher rates of residents requiring anxiolytic prescriptions. Conclusions. The findings from this study indicate no beneficial effects of the EA in terms of cognition, functional status, survival, infection rate, or cost of care after 1 year. However, qualitative observations at the Eden site indicated that the change was positive for many staff as well as residents, suggesting that it may take longer than a year to demonstrate improvements attributable to the EA.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036300397&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036300397&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/gerona/57.7.M422

DO - 10.1093/gerona/57.7.M422

M3 - Article

C2 - 12084803

AN - SCOPUS:0036300397

VL - 57

SP - M422-M427

JO - Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

JF - Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

SN - 1079-5006

IS - 7

ER -