The Effect of Decalcified Root Surfaces on Dentinal Bond Strength

Fusun Ozer, Michael Sher, Leila Daneshmehr, Said Karabekiroglu, Gulden Sinmazisik, Nimet Unlu, Markus B. Blatz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Microtensile bond strengths of current dentin adhesives to intact and decalcified root surfaces were evaluated. Two hundred and twenty-four extracted human incisors were divided into two groups as intact (IRD) and decalcified (DRD). The roots of DRD teeth were placed in a demineralization solution to produce artificial carious-like lesions. Root surfaces were slightly ground and treated with either Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (SMP), Adper Single Bond Plus (SBP), Adper Easy Bond (AEB), Scotchbond SE (SSE), Clearfil SE Bond (CSE), Clearfil Protect Bond (CPB), Clearfil Tri-S Bond (CTS), FL-Bond II (FLB), XP Bond (XPB), iBond (IB), AdheSE Bond (ASE), Optibond Solo Plus (OSP), Prelude Dental Adhesive (PDA), and G-Bond (GB). Composite build-ups were formed on the bonded surfaces. After thermocycling, hour-glass shaped specimens with an area of 1 mm2 at the bonded interface were subjected to microtensile testing. Resin-dentin interfaces were observed with SEM. Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney-U tests were used for statistical analysis. There was not significant difference between bond strengths to intact and decalcified dentin, with the exception of ASE and CSE, which had higher values to IRD (p <0.05). SSE and CTS were the adhesives that showed higher bond strengths to DRD than to IRD, however the difference was not significant (p > 0.05). The self-etch adhesives performed better on both IRD and DRD surfaces than etch-and-rinse systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)469-484
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Adhesion
Volume92
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

adhesives
Adhesives
Dental Cements
Thermal cycling
teeth
statistical analysis
lesions
resins
Statistical methods
Resins
Glass
Scanning electron microscopy
scanning electron microscopy
composite materials
glass
Composite materials
Testing
G-Bond
Clearfil Tri-S Bond
Single Bond Plus

Keywords

  • Adhesive materials
  • Composites
  • Dentistry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films
  • Materials Chemistry
  • Chemistry(all)
  • Surfaces and Interfaces

Cite this

Ozer, F., Sher, M., Daneshmehr, L., Karabekiroglu, S., Sinmazisik, G., Unlu, N., & Blatz, M. B. (2016). The Effect of Decalcified Root Surfaces on Dentinal Bond Strength. Journal of Adhesion, 92(6), 469-484. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2015.1043734

The Effect of Decalcified Root Surfaces on Dentinal Bond Strength. / Ozer, Fusun; Sher, Michael; Daneshmehr, Leila; Karabekiroglu, Said; Sinmazisik, Gulden; Unlu, Nimet; Blatz, Markus B.

In: Journal of Adhesion, Vol. 92, No. 6, 02.06.2016, p. 469-484.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ozer, F, Sher, M, Daneshmehr, L, Karabekiroglu, S, Sinmazisik, G, Unlu, N & Blatz, MB 2016, 'The Effect of Decalcified Root Surfaces on Dentinal Bond Strength', Journal of Adhesion, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 469-484. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2015.1043734
Ozer F, Sher M, Daneshmehr L, Karabekiroglu S, Sinmazisik G, Unlu N et al. The Effect of Decalcified Root Surfaces on Dentinal Bond Strength. Journal of Adhesion. 2016 Jun 2;92(6):469-484. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2015.1043734
Ozer, Fusun ; Sher, Michael ; Daneshmehr, Leila ; Karabekiroglu, Said ; Sinmazisik, Gulden ; Unlu, Nimet ; Blatz, Markus B. / The Effect of Decalcified Root Surfaces on Dentinal Bond Strength. In: Journal of Adhesion. 2016 ; Vol. 92, No. 6. pp. 469-484.
@article{f535b3119d0f4fba8c7a0c30cf9ec7f0,
title = "The Effect of Decalcified Root Surfaces on Dentinal Bond Strength",
abstract = "Microtensile bond strengths of current dentin adhesives to intact and decalcified root surfaces were evaluated. Two hundred and twenty-four extracted human incisors were divided into two groups as intact (IRD) and decalcified (DRD). The roots of DRD teeth were placed in a demineralization solution to produce artificial carious-like lesions. Root surfaces were slightly ground and treated with either Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (SMP), Adper Single Bond Plus (SBP), Adper Easy Bond (AEB), Scotchbond SE (SSE), Clearfil SE Bond (CSE), Clearfil Protect Bond (CPB), Clearfil Tri-S Bond (CTS), FL-Bond II (FLB), XP Bond (XPB), iBond (IB), AdheSE Bond (ASE), Optibond Solo Plus (OSP), Prelude Dental Adhesive (PDA), and G-Bond (GB). Composite build-ups were formed on the bonded surfaces. After thermocycling, hour-glass shaped specimens with an area of 1 mm2 at the bonded interface were subjected to microtensile testing. Resin-dentin interfaces were observed with SEM. Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney-U tests were used for statistical analysis. There was not significant difference between bond strengths to intact and decalcified dentin, with the exception of ASE and CSE, which had higher values to IRD (p <0.05). SSE and CTS were the adhesives that showed higher bond strengths to DRD than to IRD, however the difference was not significant (p > 0.05). The self-etch adhesives performed better on both IRD and DRD surfaces than etch-and-rinse systems.",
keywords = "Adhesive materials, Composites, Dentistry",
author = "Fusun Ozer and Michael Sher and Leila Daneshmehr and Said Karabekiroglu and Gulden Sinmazisik and Nimet Unlu and Blatz, {Markus B.}",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/00218464.2015.1043734",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "92",
pages = "469--484",
journal = "Journal of Adhesion",
issn = "0021-8464",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Effect of Decalcified Root Surfaces on Dentinal Bond Strength

AU - Ozer, Fusun

AU - Sher, Michael

AU - Daneshmehr, Leila

AU - Karabekiroglu, Said

AU - Sinmazisik, Gulden

AU - Unlu, Nimet

AU - Blatz, Markus B.

PY - 2016/6/2

Y1 - 2016/6/2

N2 - Microtensile bond strengths of current dentin adhesives to intact and decalcified root surfaces were evaluated. Two hundred and twenty-four extracted human incisors were divided into two groups as intact (IRD) and decalcified (DRD). The roots of DRD teeth were placed in a demineralization solution to produce artificial carious-like lesions. Root surfaces were slightly ground and treated with either Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (SMP), Adper Single Bond Plus (SBP), Adper Easy Bond (AEB), Scotchbond SE (SSE), Clearfil SE Bond (CSE), Clearfil Protect Bond (CPB), Clearfil Tri-S Bond (CTS), FL-Bond II (FLB), XP Bond (XPB), iBond (IB), AdheSE Bond (ASE), Optibond Solo Plus (OSP), Prelude Dental Adhesive (PDA), and G-Bond (GB). Composite build-ups were formed on the bonded surfaces. After thermocycling, hour-glass shaped specimens with an area of 1 mm2 at the bonded interface were subjected to microtensile testing. Resin-dentin interfaces were observed with SEM. Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney-U tests were used for statistical analysis. There was not significant difference between bond strengths to intact and decalcified dentin, with the exception of ASE and CSE, which had higher values to IRD (p <0.05). SSE and CTS were the adhesives that showed higher bond strengths to DRD than to IRD, however the difference was not significant (p > 0.05). The self-etch adhesives performed better on both IRD and DRD surfaces than etch-and-rinse systems.

AB - Microtensile bond strengths of current dentin adhesives to intact and decalcified root surfaces were evaluated. Two hundred and twenty-four extracted human incisors were divided into two groups as intact (IRD) and decalcified (DRD). The roots of DRD teeth were placed in a demineralization solution to produce artificial carious-like lesions. Root surfaces were slightly ground and treated with either Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (SMP), Adper Single Bond Plus (SBP), Adper Easy Bond (AEB), Scotchbond SE (SSE), Clearfil SE Bond (CSE), Clearfil Protect Bond (CPB), Clearfil Tri-S Bond (CTS), FL-Bond II (FLB), XP Bond (XPB), iBond (IB), AdheSE Bond (ASE), Optibond Solo Plus (OSP), Prelude Dental Adhesive (PDA), and G-Bond (GB). Composite build-ups were formed on the bonded surfaces. After thermocycling, hour-glass shaped specimens with an area of 1 mm2 at the bonded interface were subjected to microtensile testing. Resin-dentin interfaces were observed with SEM. Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney-U tests were used for statistical analysis. There was not significant difference between bond strengths to intact and decalcified dentin, with the exception of ASE and CSE, which had higher values to IRD (p <0.05). SSE and CTS were the adhesives that showed higher bond strengths to DRD than to IRD, however the difference was not significant (p > 0.05). The self-etch adhesives performed better on both IRD and DRD surfaces than etch-and-rinse systems.

KW - Adhesive materials

KW - Composites

KW - Dentistry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952705281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84952705281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00218464.2015.1043734

DO - 10.1080/00218464.2015.1043734

M3 - Article

VL - 92

SP - 469

EP - 484

JO - Journal of Adhesion

JF - Journal of Adhesion

SN - 0021-8464

IS - 6

ER -