The microtensile bond strength of self-etching adhesives to ground enamel

William W. Brackett, Shuichi Ito, Yoshihiro Nishitani, Larry D. Haisch, David H. Pashley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is uncertain whether single-phase self-etching adhesives form bonds to enamel as reliable as those of etch-and-rinse adhesives. This study compared the microtensile bond strengths to ground enamel of three self-etching adhesive systems, a self-etching primer system and an etch-and-rinse adhesive system. Human enamel was ground flat with 320-grit silicone carbide paper. The self-etching adhesives iBond (Heraeus Kulzer), Prompt L-Pop (3M ESPE) and Xeno III (Caulk/Dentsply), the adhesive with a self-etching primer Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray) and the etch-and-rinse adhesive Scotchbond Multipur-pose (3M/ESPE) were applied as directed, followed by a core of the same manufacturers' hybrid resin composite. A microtensile bond strength evaluation was performed after 48 hours of water storage, using untrimmed beams approximately 0.9 mm2 in cross-sectional area at a crosshead speed of 0.6 mm/minute. There were no pretest failures in any group, and failures were predominately adhesive or mixed. Adhesion to enamel of Clearfil SE was not significantly different from Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, while the three self-etching adhesive systems demonstrated significantly lower bond strengths (One-way ANOVA, Tukey-Kramer Multiple-Comparison Test, p<0.00001).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)332-337
Number of pages6
JournalOperative Dentistry
Volume31
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2006

Fingerprint

Dental Enamel
Adhesives
Composite Resins
Silicones
Analysis of Variance
Water

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

The microtensile bond strength of self-etching adhesives to ground enamel. / Brackett, William W.; Ito, Shuichi; Nishitani, Yoshihiro; Haisch, Larry D.; Pashley, David H.

In: Operative Dentistry, Vol. 31, No. 3, 01.01.2006, p. 332-337.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brackett, WW, Ito, S, Nishitani, Y, Haisch, LD & Pashley, DH 2006, 'The microtensile bond strength of self-etching adhesives to ground enamel', Operative Dentistry, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 332-337. https://doi.org/10.2341/05-38
Brackett, William W. ; Ito, Shuichi ; Nishitani, Yoshihiro ; Haisch, Larry D. ; Pashley, David H. / The microtensile bond strength of self-etching adhesives to ground enamel. In: Operative Dentistry. 2006 ; Vol. 31, No. 3. pp. 332-337.
@article{0bd7e246c8784ca6ab754e8d68c7287b,
title = "The microtensile bond strength of self-etching adhesives to ground enamel",
abstract = "It is uncertain whether single-phase self-etching adhesives form bonds to enamel as reliable as those of etch-and-rinse adhesives. This study compared the microtensile bond strengths to ground enamel of three self-etching adhesive systems, a self-etching primer system and an etch-and-rinse adhesive system. Human enamel was ground flat with 320-grit silicone carbide paper. The self-etching adhesives iBond (Heraeus Kulzer), Prompt L-Pop (3M ESPE) and Xeno III (Caulk/Dentsply), the adhesive with a self-etching primer Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray) and the etch-and-rinse adhesive Scotchbond Multipur-pose (3M/ESPE) were applied as directed, followed by a core of the same manufacturers' hybrid resin composite. A microtensile bond strength evaluation was performed after 48 hours of water storage, using untrimmed beams approximately 0.9 mm2 in cross-sectional area at a crosshead speed of 0.6 mm/minute. There were no pretest failures in any group, and failures were predominately adhesive or mixed. Adhesion to enamel of Clearfil SE was not significantly different from Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, while the three self-etching adhesive systems demonstrated significantly lower bond strengths (One-way ANOVA, Tukey-Kramer Multiple-Comparison Test, p<0.00001).",
author = "Brackett, {William W.} and Shuichi Ito and Yoshihiro Nishitani and Haisch, {Larry D.} and Pashley, {David H.}",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2341/05-38",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "332--337",
journal = "Operative Dentistry",
issn = "0361-7734",
publisher = "Indiana University School of Dentistry",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The microtensile bond strength of self-etching adhesives to ground enamel

AU - Brackett, William W.

AU - Ito, Shuichi

AU - Nishitani, Yoshihiro

AU - Haisch, Larry D.

AU - Pashley, David H.

PY - 2006/1/1

Y1 - 2006/1/1

N2 - It is uncertain whether single-phase self-etching adhesives form bonds to enamel as reliable as those of etch-and-rinse adhesives. This study compared the microtensile bond strengths to ground enamel of three self-etching adhesive systems, a self-etching primer system and an etch-and-rinse adhesive system. Human enamel was ground flat with 320-grit silicone carbide paper. The self-etching adhesives iBond (Heraeus Kulzer), Prompt L-Pop (3M ESPE) and Xeno III (Caulk/Dentsply), the adhesive with a self-etching primer Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray) and the etch-and-rinse adhesive Scotchbond Multipur-pose (3M/ESPE) were applied as directed, followed by a core of the same manufacturers' hybrid resin composite. A microtensile bond strength evaluation was performed after 48 hours of water storage, using untrimmed beams approximately 0.9 mm2 in cross-sectional area at a crosshead speed of 0.6 mm/minute. There were no pretest failures in any group, and failures were predominately adhesive or mixed. Adhesion to enamel of Clearfil SE was not significantly different from Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, while the three self-etching adhesive systems demonstrated significantly lower bond strengths (One-way ANOVA, Tukey-Kramer Multiple-Comparison Test, p<0.00001).

AB - It is uncertain whether single-phase self-etching adhesives form bonds to enamel as reliable as those of etch-and-rinse adhesives. This study compared the microtensile bond strengths to ground enamel of three self-etching adhesive systems, a self-etching primer system and an etch-and-rinse adhesive system. Human enamel was ground flat with 320-grit silicone carbide paper. The self-etching adhesives iBond (Heraeus Kulzer), Prompt L-Pop (3M ESPE) and Xeno III (Caulk/Dentsply), the adhesive with a self-etching primer Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray) and the etch-and-rinse adhesive Scotchbond Multipur-pose (3M/ESPE) were applied as directed, followed by a core of the same manufacturers' hybrid resin composite. A microtensile bond strength evaluation was performed after 48 hours of water storage, using untrimmed beams approximately 0.9 mm2 in cross-sectional area at a crosshead speed of 0.6 mm/minute. There were no pretest failures in any group, and failures were predominately adhesive or mixed. Adhesion to enamel of Clearfil SE was not significantly different from Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, while the three self-etching adhesive systems demonstrated significantly lower bond strengths (One-way ANOVA, Tukey-Kramer Multiple-Comparison Test, p<0.00001).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745460896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745460896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2341/05-38

DO - 10.2341/05-38

M3 - Article

C2 - 16802641

AN - SCOPUS:33745460896

VL - 31

SP - 332

EP - 337

JO - Operative Dentistry

JF - Operative Dentistry

SN - 0361-7734

IS - 3

ER -