The practice of prophylactic mastectomy: A survey of Maryland surgeons

F. Houn, K. J. Helzlsouer, N. B. Friedman, M. E. Stefanek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy is a drastic breast cancer preventive option for which indications are not standardized and efficacy has not been proven. To estimate the magnitude of this controversial practice, surgeons were surveyed on their recommendations about and performance of prophylactic mastectomy. Methods. A cross-sectional survey was sent to general surgeons (n = 522), plastic surgeons (n = 80), and gynecologists (n = 801) licensed to practice in Maryland in 1992. Proportions responding were 41.9%, 66.3%, and 54.9%, respectively. In addition, there were 30 respondents who identified 'other' as their specialty. The respondents were asked about the role of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and the number of times they had recommended performed it in a year. Results. Seven hundred forty-two surgeons responded (51.8%). More plastic surgeons (84.6%) than general surgeons (47.0%) and gynecologists (38.3%) agreed that bilateral prophylactic mastectomy has a role in the care of high-risk women. Eighty-one percent of plastic surgeons had recommended the procedure, compared with 38.8% of general surgeons and 17.7% of gynecologists. Conclusions. Indications and practice patterns reveal heterogeneity of medical opinion and practice of prophylactic mastectomy. This study raises the need for better evaluation of the efficacy and appropriateness of prophylactic mastectomy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)801-805
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican journal of public health
Volume85
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1995

Fingerprint

Prophylactic Mastectomy
Surveys and Questionnaires
Surgeons
Cross-Sectional Studies
Breast Neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

The practice of prophylactic mastectomy : A survey of Maryland surgeons. / Houn, F.; Helzlsouer, K. J.; Friedman, N. B.; Stefanek, M. E.

In: American journal of public health, Vol. 85, No. 6, 01.01.1995, p. 801-805.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Houn, F, Helzlsouer, KJ, Friedman, NB & Stefanek, ME 1995, 'The practice of prophylactic mastectomy: A survey of Maryland surgeons', American journal of public health, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 801-805. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.85.6.801
Houn, F. ; Helzlsouer, K. J. ; Friedman, N. B. ; Stefanek, M. E. / The practice of prophylactic mastectomy : A survey of Maryland surgeons. In: American journal of public health. 1995 ; Vol. 85, No. 6. pp. 801-805.
@article{9d5ecb8f9aa34172958e3a1d259709f5,
title = "The practice of prophylactic mastectomy: A survey of Maryland surgeons",
abstract = "Objectives. Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy is a drastic breast cancer preventive option for which indications are not standardized and efficacy has not been proven. To estimate the magnitude of this controversial practice, surgeons were surveyed on their recommendations about and performance of prophylactic mastectomy. Methods. A cross-sectional survey was sent to general surgeons (n = 522), plastic surgeons (n = 80), and gynecologists (n = 801) licensed to practice in Maryland in 1992. Proportions responding were 41.9{\%}, 66.3{\%}, and 54.9{\%}, respectively. In addition, there were 30 respondents who identified 'other' as their specialty. The respondents were asked about the role of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and the number of times they had recommended performed it in a year. Results. Seven hundred forty-two surgeons responded (51.8{\%}). More plastic surgeons (84.6{\%}) than general surgeons (47.0{\%}) and gynecologists (38.3{\%}) agreed that bilateral prophylactic mastectomy has a role in the care of high-risk women. Eighty-one percent of plastic surgeons had recommended the procedure, compared with 38.8{\%} of general surgeons and 17.7{\%} of gynecologists. Conclusions. Indications and practice patterns reveal heterogeneity of medical opinion and practice of prophylactic mastectomy. This study raises the need for better evaluation of the efficacy and appropriateness of prophylactic mastectomy.",
author = "F. Houn and Helzlsouer, {K. J.} and Friedman, {N. B.} and Stefanek, {M. E.}",
year = "1995",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2105/AJPH.85.6.801",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "85",
pages = "801--805",
journal = "American Journal of Public Health",
issn = "0090-0036",
publisher = "American Public Health Association Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The practice of prophylactic mastectomy

T2 - A survey of Maryland surgeons

AU - Houn, F.

AU - Helzlsouer, K. J.

AU - Friedman, N. B.

AU - Stefanek, M. E.

PY - 1995/1/1

Y1 - 1995/1/1

N2 - Objectives. Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy is a drastic breast cancer preventive option for which indications are not standardized and efficacy has not been proven. To estimate the magnitude of this controversial practice, surgeons were surveyed on their recommendations about and performance of prophylactic mastectomy. Methods. A cross-sectional survey was sent to general surgeons (n = 522), plastic surgeons (n = 80), and gynecologists (n = 801) licensed to practice in Maryland in 1992. Proportions responding were 41.9%, 66.3%, and 54.9%, respectively. In addition, there were 30 respondents who identified 'other' as their specialty. The respondents were asked about the role of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and the number of times they had recommended performed it in a year. Results. Seven hundred forty-two surgeons responded (51.8%). More plastic surgeons (84.6%) than general surgeons (47.0%) and gynecologists (38.3%) agreed that bilateral prophylactic mastectomy has a role in the care of high-risk women. Eighty-one percent of plastic surgeons had recommended the procedure, compared with 38.8% of general surgeons and 17.7% of gynecologists. Conclusions. Indications and practice patterns reveal heterogeneity of medical opinion and practice of prophylactic mastectomy. This study raises the need for better evaluation of the efficacy and appropriateness of prophylactic mastectomy.

AB - Objectives. Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy is a drastic breast cancer preventive option for which indications are not standardized and efficacy has not been proven. To estimate the magnitude of this controversial practice, surgeons were surveyed on their recommendations about and performance of prophylactic mastectomy. Methods. A cross-sectional survey was sent to general surgeons (n = 522), plastic surgeons (n = 80), and gynecologists (n = 801) licensed to practice in Maryland in 1992. Proportions responding were 41.9%, 66.3%, and 54.9%, respectively. In addition, there were 30 respondents who identified 'other' as their specialty. The respondents were asked about the role of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and the number of times they had recommended performed it in a year. Results. Seven hundred forty-two surgeons responded (51.8%). More plastic surgeons (84.6%) than general surgeons (47.0%) and gynecologists (38.3%) agreed that bilateral prophylactic mastectomy has a role in the care of high-risk women. Eighty-one percent of plastic surgeons had recommended the procedure, compared with 38.8% of general surgeons and 17.7% of gynecologists. Conclusions. Indications and practice patterns reveal heterogeneity of medical opinion and practice of prophylactic mastectomy. This study raises the need for better evaluation of the efficacy and appropriateness of prophylactic mastectomy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029002498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029002498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.85.6.801

DO - 10.2105/AJPH.85.6.801

M3 - Article

C2 - 7762713

AN - SCOPUS:0029002498

VL - 85

SP - 801

EP - 805

JO - American Journal of Public Health

JF - American Journal of Public Health

SN - 0090-0036

IS - 6

ER -