Time course of trunk, arm, leg, and functional recovery after ischemic stroke

Geert Verheyden, Alice Nieuwboer, Liesbet De Wit, Vincent Thijs, Jan Dobbelaere, Hannes Devos, Deborah Severijns, Stefanie Vanbeveren, Willy De Weerdt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

103 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Patterns of recovery provide useful information concerning the potential of physical recovery over time and therefore the setting of realistic goals for rehabilitation programs. Objective. To compare the time course of trunk recovery with the patterns of recovery of arm, leg, and functional ability. Methods. Consecutive stroke patients were recruited in 2 acute neurology wards. Participants were evaluated at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 and 6 months after stroke. Patients were assessed with the Trunk Impairment Scale, Fugl-Meyer arm and leg test, and Barthel Index. Results. Thirty-two patients were included in the study. There were no dropouts. Repeated measures analysis of the recovery patterns of motor and functional performance revealed the most striking improvement for all measures from 1 week to 1 month (P value between.0021 and <.0001) and a significant improvement from 1 month to 3 months after stroke (P value ranges from.0008 to <.0001). No significant improvement was found between 3 and 6 months after stroke for any of the measures. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between time course of trunk, arm, leg, and functional recovery (P =.2565). No significant differences in level of motor and functional recovery were found at the different time points. Conclusions. Separate analyses of motor and functional recovery patterns after stroke confirm the importance of the first month for recovery. Contrary to common belief, the time course of recovery of the trunk is similar to the recovery of arm, leg, and functional ability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)173-179
Number of pages7
JournalNeurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2008

Fingerprint

Leg
Arm
Stroke
Neurology
Rehabilitation

Keywords

  • Cerebrovascular accident
  • Recovery of function
  • Rehabilitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Verheyden, G., Nieuwboer, A., De Wit, L., Thijs, V., Dobbelaere, J., Devos, H., ... De Weerdt, W. (2008). Time course of trunk, arm, leg, and functional recovery after ischemic stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 22(2), 173-179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968307305456

Time course of trunk, arm, leg, and functional recovery after ischemic stroke. / Verheyden, Geert; Nieuwboer, Alice; De Wit, Liesbet; Thijs, Vincent; Dobbelaere, Jan; Devos, Hannes; Severijns, Deborah; Vanbeveren, Stefanie; De Weerdt, Willy.

In: Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 22, No. 2, 01.03.2008, p. 173-179.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Verheyden, G, Nieuwboer, A, De Wit, L, Thijs, V, Dobbelaere, J, Devos, H, Severijns, D, Vanbeveren, S & De Weerdt, W 2008, 'Time course of trunk, arm, leg, and functional recovery after ischemic stroke', Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 173-179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968307305456
Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, De Wit L, Thijs V, Dobbelaere J, Devos H et al. Time course of trunk, arm, leg, and functional recovery after ischemic stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2008 Mar 1;22(2):173-179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968307305456
Verheyden, Geert ; Nieuwboer, Alice ; De Wit, Liesbet ; Thijs, Vincent ; Dobbelaere, Jan ; Devos, Hannes ; Severijns, Deborah ; Vanbeveren, Stefanie ; De Weerdt, Willy. / Time course of trunk, arm, leg, and functional recovery after ischemic stroke. In: Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2008 ; Vol. 22, No. 2. pp. 173-179.
@article{9f80e23a0973479095e8afd8a278d650,
title = "Time course of trunk, arm, leg, and functional recovery after ischemic stroke",
abstract = "Background. Patterns of recovery provide useful information concerning the potential of physical recovery over time and therefore the setting of realistic goals for rehabilitation programs. Objective. To compare the time course of trunk recovery with the patterns of recovery of arm, leg, and functional ability. Methods. Consecutive stroke patients were recruited in 2 acute neurology wards. Participants were evaluated at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 and 6 months after stroke. Patients were assessed with the Trunk Impairment Scale, Fugl-Meyer arm and leg test, and Barthel Index. Results. Thirty-two patients were included in the study. There were no dropouts. Repeated measures analysis of the recovery patterns of motor and functional performance revealed the most striking improvement for all measures from 1 week to 1 month (P value between.0021 and <.0001) and a significant improvement from 1 month to 3 months after stroke (P value ranges from.0008 to <.0001). No significant improvement was found between 3 and 6 months after stroke for any of the measures. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between time course of trunk, arm, leg, and functional recovery (P =.2565). No significant differences in level of motor and functional recovery were found at the different time points. Conclusions. Separate analyses of motor and functional recovery patterns after stroke confirm the importance of the first month for recovery. Contrary to common belief, the time course of recovery of the trunk is similar to the recovery of arm, leg, and functional ability.",
keywords = "Cerebrovascular accident, Recovery of function, Rehabilitation",
author = "Geert Verheyden and Alice Nieuwboer and {De Wit}, Liesbet and Vincent Thijs and Jan Dobbelaere and Hannes Devos and Deborah Severijns and Stefanie Vanbeveren and {De Weerdt}, Willy",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1545968307305456",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "173--179",
journal = "Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair",
issn = "1545-9683",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Time course of trunk, arm, leg, and functional recovery after ischemic stroke

AU - Verheyden, Geert

AU - Nieuwboer, Alice

AU - De Wit, Liesbet

AU - Thijs, Vincent

AU - Dobbelaere, Jan

AU - Devos, Hannes

AU - Severijns, Deborah

AU - Vanbeveren, Stefanie

AU - De Weerdt, Willy

PY - 2008/3/1

Y1 - 2008/3/1

N2 - Background. Patterns of recovery provide useful information concerning the potential of physical recovery over time and therefore the setting of realistic goals for rehabilitation programs. Objective. To compare the time course of trunk recovery with the patterns of recovery of arm, leg, and functional ability. Methods. Consecutive stroke patients were recruited in 2 acute neurology wards. Participants were evaluated at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 and 6 months after stroke. Patients were assessed with the Trunk Impairment Scale, Fugl-Meyer arm and leg test, and Barthel Index. Results. Thirty-two patients were included in the study. There were no dropouts. Repeated measures analysis of the recovery patterns of motor and functional performance revealed the most striking improvement for all measures from 1 week to 1 month (P value between.0021 and <.0001) and a significant improvement from 1 month to 3 months after stroke (P value ranges from.0008 to <.0001). No significant improvement was found between 3 and 6 months after stroke for any of the measures. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between time course of trunk, arm, leg, and functional recovery (P =.2565). No significant differences in level of motor and functional recovery were found at the different time points. Conclusions. Separate analyses of motor and functional recovery patterns after stroke confirm the importance of the first month for recovery. Contrary to common belief, the time course of recovery of the trunk is similar to the recovery of arm, leg, and functional ability.

AB - Background. Patterns of recovery provide useful information concerning the potential of physical recovery over time and therefore the setting of realistic goals for rehabilitation programs. Objective. To compare the time course of trunk recovery with the patterns of recovery of arm, leg, and functional ability. Methods. Consecutive stroke patients were recruited in 2 acute neurology wards. Participants were evaluated at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 and 6 months after stroke. Patients were assessed with the Trunk Impairment Scale, Fugl-Meyer arm and leg test, and Barthel Index. Results. Thirty-two patients were included in the study. There were no dropouts. Repeated measures analysis of the recovery patterns of motor and functional performance revealed the most striking improvement for all measures from 1 week to 1 month (P value between.0021 and <.0001) and a significant improvement from 1 month to 3 months after stroke (P value ranges from.0008 to <.0001). No significant improvement was found between 3 and 6 months after stroke for any of the measures. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between time course of trunk, arm, leg, and functional recovery (P =.2565). No significant differences in level of motor and functional recovery were found at the different time points. Conclusions. Separate analyses of motor and functional recovery patterns after stroke confirm the importance of the first month for recovery. Contrary to common belief, the time course of recovery of the trunk is similar to the recovery of arm, leg, and functional ability.

KW - Cerebrovascular accident

KW - Recovery of function

KW - Rehabilitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=39649092059&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=39649092059&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1545968307305456

DO - 10.1177/1545968307305456

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 173

EP - 179

JO - Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

JF - Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

SN - 1545-9683

IS - 2

ER -