Transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasound for monitoring of follicular development in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program: Patient response

Gad Lavy, Michael Peter Diamond, Filomena Nero, Katherine Schark, Alan H. DeCherney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Patients' response to daily ultrasound scanning by either a transvaginal or a transabdominal method for the purpose of monitoring the ovarian response to gonadotropin therapy in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program has been evaluated. A questionnaire was used to determine various aspects of these two procedures, sources of discontent, and the patients' preference. The vast majority of patients reported less discomfort and generally preferred the transvaginal over the transabdominal scanning method. The transvaginal method is easy to perform, affords excellent visualization of the pelvic organs, and in addition, is clearly preferred by patients over the transabdominal technique. We recommend its use in patients monitored for IVF-ET and for a variety of other clinical conditions requiring detailed evaluation of the pelvic organs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)293-295
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer
Volume4
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 1987
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Embryo Transfer
Fertilization in Vitro
Patient Preference
Gonadotropins
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Embryology
  • Developmental Biology

Cite this

Transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasound for monitoring of follicular development in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program : Patient response. / Lavy, Gad; Diamond, Michael Peter; Nero, Filomena; Schark, Katherine; DeCherney, Alan H.

In: Journal of in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer, Vol. 4, No. 5, 01.10.1987, p. 293-295.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0a3cd47e6bf54eccbd67e9998e3f8cb3,
title = "Transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasound for monitoring of follicular development in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program: Patient response",
abstract = "Patients' response to daily ultrasound scanning by either a transvaginal or a transabdominal method for the purpose of monitoring the ovarian response to gonadotropin therapy in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program has been evaluated. A questionnaire was used to determine various aspects of these two procedures, sources of discontent, and the patients' preference. The vast majority of patients reported less discomfort and generally preferred the transvaginal over the transabdominal scanning method. The transvaginal method is easy to perform, affords excellent visualization of the pelvic organs, and in addition, is clearly preferred by patients over the transabdominal technique. We recommend its use in patients monitored for IVF-ET and for a variety of other clinical conditions requiring detailed evaluation of the pelvic organs.",
author = "Gad Lavy and Diamond, {Michael Peter} and Filomena Nero and Katherine Schark and DeCherney, {Alan H.}",
year = "1987",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/BF01555209",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "293--295",
journal = "Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics",
issn = "1058-0468",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasound for monitoring of follicular development in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program

T2 - Patient response

AU - Lavy, Gad

AU - Diamond, Michael Peter

AU - Nero, Filomena

AU - Schark, Katherine

AU - DeCherney, Alan H.

PY - 1987/10/1

Y1 - 1987/10/1

N2 - Patients' response to daily ultrasound scanning by either a transvaginal or a transabdominal method for the purpose of monitoring the ovarian response to gonadotropin therapy in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program has been evaluated. A questionnaire was used to determine various aspects of these two procedures, sources of discontent, and the patients' preference. The vast majority of patients reported less discomfort and generally preferred the transvaginal over the transabdominal scanning method. The transvaginal method is easy to perform, affords excellent visualization of the pelvic organs, and in addition, is clearly preferred by patients over the transabdominal technique. We recommend its use in patients monitored for IVF-ET and for a variety of other clinical conditions requiring detailed evaluation of the pelvic organs.

AB - Patients' response to daily ultrasound scanning by either a transvaginal or a transabdominal method for the purpose of monitoring the ovarian response to gonadotropin therapy in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program has been evaluated. A questionnaire was used to determine various aspects of these two procedures, sources of discontent, and the patients' preference. The vast majority of patients reported less discomfort and generally preferred the transvaginal over the transabdominal scanning method. The transvaginal method is easy to perform, affords excellent visualization of the pelvic organs, and in addition, is clearly preferred by patients over the transabdominal technique. We recommend its use in patients monitored for IVF-ET and for a variety of other clinical conditions requiring detailed evaluation of the pelvic organs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023431566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023431566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF01555209

DO - 10.1007/BF01555209

M3 - Article

C2 - 3320230

AN - SCOPUS:0023431566

VL - 4

SP - 293

EP - 295

JO - Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

JF - Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

SN - 1058-0468

IS - 5

ER -