Use of decision models in the development of evidence-based clinical preventive services recommendations: Methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

on behalf of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) develops evidence-based recommendations about preventive care based on comprehensive systematic reviews of the best available evidence. Decision models provide a complementary, quantitative approach to support the USPSTF as it deliberates about the evidence and develops recommendations for clinical and policy use. This article describes the rationale for using modeling, an approach to selecting topics for modeling, and how modeling may inform recommendations about clinical preventive services. Decision modeling is useful when clinical questions remain about how to target an empirically established clinical preventive service at the individual or program level or when complex determinations of magnitude of net benefit, overall or among important subpopulations, are required. Before deciding whether to use decision modeling, the USPSTF assesses whether the benefits and harms of the preventive service have been established empirically, assesses whether there are key issues about applicability or implementation that modeling could address, and then defines the decision problem and key questions to address through modeling. Decision analyses conducted for the USPSTF are expected to follow best practices for modeling. For chosen topics, the USPSTF assesses the strengths and limitations of the systematically reviewed evidence and the modeling analyses and integrates the results of each to make preventive service recommendations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)501-508
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of internal medicine
Volume165
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 4 2016

Fingerprint

Advisory Committees
Decision Support Techniques
Preventive Medicine
Practice Guidelines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Use of decision models in the development of evidence-based clinical preventive services recommendations : Methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. / on behalf of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

In: Annals of internal medicine, Vol. 165, No. 7, 04.10.2016, p. 501-508.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fce9301aef6a4791877bfefc137d3d51,
title = "Use of decision models in the development of evidence-based clinical preventive services recommendations: Methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force",
abstract = "The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) develops evidence-based recommendations about preventive care based on comprehensive systematic reviews of the best available evidence. Decision models provide a complementary, quantitative approach to support the USPSTF as it deliberates about the evidence and develops recommendations for clinical and policy use. This article describes the rationale for using modeling, an approach to selecting topics for modeling, and how modeling may inform recommendations about clinical preventive services. Decision modeling is useful when clinical questions remain about how to target an empirically established clinical preventive service at the individual or program level or when complex determinations of magnitude of net benefit, overall or among important subpopulations, are required. Before deciding whether to use decision modeling, the USPSTF assesses whether the benefits and harms of the preventive service have been established empirically, assesses whether there are key issues about applicability or implementation that modeling could address, and then defines the decision problem and key questions to address through modeling. Decision analyses conducted for the USPSTF are expected to follow best practices for modeling. For chosen topics, the USPSTF assesses the strengths and limitations of the systematically reviewed evidence and the modeling analyses and integrates the results of each to make preventive service recommendations.",
author = "{on behalf of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force} and Owens, {Douglas K.} and Whitlock, {Evelyn P.} and Jillian Henderson and Pignone, {Michael P.} and Krist, {Alex H.} and Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo and Curry, {Susan J.} and Davidson, {Karina W.} and Mark Ebell and Gillman, {Matthew W.} and Grossman, {David C.} and Kemper, {Alex R.} and Kurth, {Ann E.} and Michael MacIosek and Siu, {Albert L.} and LeFevre, {Michael L.}",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "4",
doi = "10.7326/M15-2531",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "165",
pages = "501--508",
journal = "Annals of Internal Medicine",
issn = "0003-4819",
publisher = "American College of Physicians",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of decision models in the development of evidence-based clinical preventive services recommendations

T2 - Methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

AU - on behalf of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

AU - Owens, Douglas K.

AU - Whitlock, Evelyn P.

AU - Henderson, Jillian

AU - Pignone, Michael P.

AU - Krist, Alex H.

AU - Bibbins-Domingo, Kirsten

AU - Curry, Susan J.

AU - Davidson, Karina W.

AU - Ebell, Mark

AU - Gillman, Matthew W.

AU - Grossman, David C.

AU - Kemper, Alex R.

AU - Kurth, Ann E.

AU - MacIosek, Michael

AU - Siu, Albert L.

AU - LeFevre, Michael L.

PY - 2016/10/4

Y1 - 2016/10/4

N2 - The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) develops evidence-based recommendations about preventive care based on comprehensive systematic reviews of the best available evidence. Decision models provide a complementary, quantitative approach to support the USPSTF as it deliberates about the evidence and develops recommendations for clinical and policy use. This article describes the rationale for using modeling, an approach to selecting topics for modeling, and how modeling may inform recommendations about clinical preventive services. Decision modeling is useful when clinical questions remain about how to target an empirically established clinical preventive service at the individual or program level or when complex determinations of magnitude of net benefit, overall or among important subpopulations, are required. Before deciding whether to use decision modeling, the USPSTF assesses whether the benefits and harms of the preventive service have been established empirically, assesses whether there are key issues about applicability or implementation that modeling could address, and then defines the decision problem and key questions to address through modeling. Decision analyses conducted for the USPSTF are expected to follow best practices for modeling. For chosen topics, the USPSTF assesses the strengths and limitations of the systematically reviewed evidence and the modeling analyses and integrates the results of each to make preventive service recommendations.

AB - The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) develops evidence-based recommendations about preventive care based on comprehensive systematic reviews of the best available evidence. Decision models provide a complementary, quantitative approach to support the USPSTF as it deliberates about the evidence and develops recommendations for clinical and policy use. This article describes the rationale for using modeling, an approach to selecting topics for modeling, and how modeling may inform recommendations about clinical preventive services. Decision modeling is useful when clinical questions remain about how to target an empirically established clinical preventive service at the individual or program level or when complex determinations of magnitude of net benefit, overall or among important subpopulations, are required. Before deciding whether to use decision modeling, the USPSTF assesses whether the benefits and harms of the preventive service have been established empirically, assesses whether there are key issues about applicability or implementation that modeling could address, and then defines the decision problem and key questions to address through modeling. Decision analyses conducted for the USPSTF are expected to follow best practices for modeling. For chosen topics, the USPSTF assesses the strengths and limitations of the systematically reviewed evidence and the modeling analyses and integrates the results of each to make preventive service recommendations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84990062641&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84990062641&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7326/M15-2531

DO - 10.7326/M15-2531

M3 - Article

C2 - 27379742

AN - SCOPUS:84990062641

VL - 165

SP - 501

EP - 508

JO - Annals of Internal Medicine

JF - Annals of Internal Medicine

SN - 0003-4819

IS - 7

ER -