Users' guides to the medical literature: XXV. Evidence-based medicine: Principles for applying the users' guides to patient care

Gordon H. Guyatt, R. Brian Haynes, Roman Z. Jaeschke, Deborah J. Cook, Lee Green, C. David Naylor, Mark C. Wilson, Scott Richardson

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

521 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This series provides clinicians with strategies and tools to interpret and integrate evidence from published research in their care of patients. The 2 key principles for applying all the articles in this series to patient care relate to the value-laden nature of clinical decisions and to the hierarchy of evidence postulated by evidence-based medicine. Clinicians need to be able to distinguish high from low quality in primary studies, systematic reviews, practice guidelines, and other integrative research focused on management recommendations. An evidence-based practitioner must also understand the patient's circumstances or predicament; identify knowledge gaps and frame questions to fill those gaps; conduct an efficient literature search; critically appraise the research evidence; and apply that evidence to patient care. However, treatment judgments often reflect clinician or societal values concerning whether intervention benefits are worth the cost. Many unanswered questions concerning how to elicit preferences and how to incorporate them in clinical encounters constitute an enormously challenging frontier for evidence-based medicine. Time limitation remains the biggest obstacle to evidence-based practice but clinicians should seek evidence from as high in the appropriate hierarchy of evidence as possible, and every clinical decision should be geared toward the particularly circumstances of the patient.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1290-1296
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American Medical Association
Volume284
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 13 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Evidence-Based Medicine
Patient Care
Research
Evidence-Based Practice
Practice Guidelines
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Users' guides to the medical literature : XXV. Evidence-based medicine: Principles for applying the users' guides to patient care. / Guyatt, Gordon H.; Haynes, R. Brian; Jaeschke, Roman Z.; Cook, Deborah J.; Green, Lee; Naylor, C. David; Wilson, Mark C.; Richardson, Scott.

In: Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 284, No. 10, 13.09.2000, p. 1290-1296.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Guyatt, Gordon H. ; Haynes, R. Brian ; Jaeschke, Roman Z. ; Cook, Deborah J. ; Green, Lee ; Naylor, C. David ; Wilson, Mark C. ; Richardson, Scott. / Users' guides to the medical literature : XXV. Evidence-based medicine: Principles for applying the users' guides to patient care. In: Journal of the American Medical Association. 2000 ; Vol. 284, No. 10. pp. 1290-1296.
@article{25bc6c3ccd4043faa03916f5e4577d7c,
title = "Users' guides to the medical literature: XXV. Evidence-based medicine: Principles for applying the users' guides to patient care",
abstract = "This series provides clinicians with strategies and tools to interpret and integrate evidence from published research in their care of patients. The 2 key principles for applying all the articles in this series to patient care relate to the value-laden nature of clinical decisions and to the hierarchy of evidence postulated by evidence-based medicine. Clinicians need to be able to distinguish high from low quality in primary studies, systematic reviews, practice guidelines, and other integrative research focused on management recommendations. An evidence-based practitioner must also understand the patient's circumstances or predicament; identify knowledge gaps and frame questions to fill those gaps; conduct an efficient literature search; critically appraise the research evidence; and apply that evidence to patient care. However, treatment judgments often reflect clinician or societal values concerning whether intervention benefits are worth the cost. Many unanswered questions concerning how to elicit preferences and how to incorporate them in clinical encounters constitute an enormously challenging frontier for evidence-based medicine. Time limitation remains the biggest obstacle to evidence-based practice but clinicians should seek evidence from as high in the appropriate hierarchy of evidence as possible, and every clinical decision should be geared toward the particularly circumstances of the patient.",
author = "Guyatt, {Gordon H.} and Haynes, {R. Brian} and Jaeschke, {Roman Z.} and Cook, {Deborah J.} and Lee Green and Naylor, {C. David} and Wilson, {Mark C.} and Scott Richardson",
year = "2000",
month = "9",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1001/jama.284.10.1290",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "284",
pages = "1290--1296",
journal = "JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association",
issn = "0002-9955",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Users' guides to the medical literature

T2 - XXV. Evidence-based medicine: Principles for applying the users' guides to patient care

AU - Guyatt, Gordon H.

AU - Haynes, R. Brian

AU - Jaeschke, Roman Z.

AU - Cook, Deborah J.

AU - Green, Lee

AU - Naylor, C. David

AU - Wilson, Mark C.

AU - Richardson, Scott

PY - 2000/9/13

Y1 - 2000/9/13

N2 - This series provides clinicians with strategies and tools to interpret and integrate evidence from published research in their care of patients. The 2 key principles for applying all the articles in this series to patient care relate to the value-laden nature of clinical decisions and to the hierarchy of evidence postulated by evidence-based medicine. Clinicians need to be able to distinguish high from low quality in primary studies, systematic reviews, practice guidelines, and other integrative research focused on management recommendations. An evidence-based practitioner must also understand the patient's circumstances or predicament; identify knowledge gaps and frame questions to fill those gaps; conduct an efficient literature search; critically appraise the research evidence; and apply that evidence to patient care. However, treatment judgments often reflect clinician or societal values concerning whether intervention benefits are worth the cost. Many unanswered questions concerning how to elicit preferences and how to incorporate them in clinical encounters constitute an enormously challenging frontier for evidence-based medicine. Time limitation remains the biggest obstacle to evidence-based practice but clinicians should seek evidence from as high in the appropriate hierarchy of evidence as possible, and every clinical decision should be geared toward the particularly circumstances of the patient.

AB - This series provides clinicians with strategies and tools to interpret and integrate evidence from published research in their care of patients. The 2 key principles for applying all the articles in this series to patient care relate to the value-laden nature of clinical decisions and to the hierarchy of evidence postulated by evidence-based medicine. Clinicians need to be able to distinguish high from low quality in primary studies, systematic reviews, practice guidelines, and other integrative research focused on management recommendations. An evidence-based practitioner must also understand the patient's circumstances or predicament; identify knowledge gaps and frame questions to fill those gaps; conduct an efficient literature search; critically appraise the research evidence; and apply that evidence to patient care. However, treatment judgments often reflect clinician or societal values concerning whether intervention benefits are worth the cost. Many unanswered questions concerning how to elicit preferences and how to incorporate them in clinical encounters constitute an enormously challenging frontier for evidence-based medicine. Time limitation remains the biggest obstacle to evidence-based practice but clinicians should seek evidence from as high in the appropriate hierarchy of evidence as possible, and every clinical decision should be geared toward the particularly circumstances of the patient.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034644397&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034644397&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/jama.284.10.1290

DO - 10.1001/jama.284.10.1290

M3 - Review article

C2 - 10979117

AN - SCOPUS:0034644397

VL - 284

SP - 1290

EP - 1296

JO - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

JF - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

SN - 0002-9955

IS - 10

ER -