Validity of radiographic evaluations of bone formation in a rat calvaria osteotomy defect model

Mary E. Pryor, Cristiano Susin, Ulf M E Wikesjö

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the validity of radiographic evaluations of bone formation in a critical-size rat calvaria osteotomy defect model. Methods: Bilateral, critical-size (∅ 6 mm) calvaria osteotomy defects in 30 adult Sprague-Dawley rats treated with a rat platelet-rich plasma preparation or control treatments were evaluated by radiographic and histometric measures following a 4- or 8-week healing interval. Standardized radiographic images of the rat calvaria gross specimens were used to assess bone formation within the defect sites by visual evaluation of the grey scale by three masked examiners. The most central portion of each defect site was subject to histometric analysis using a PC-based image analysis system. Kappa statistics and percentage agreement between the radiographic and histometric analysis were estimated. Results: Radiographic evaluations of bone formation are associated with significant weaknesses poorly representing actual healing events; κ statistics (0.17) denoting slight agreement beyond chance. Perfect agreement between the histologic and radiographic analysis for defect sites showing complete and partial histologic bone fill was achieved 63% and 50% of the time, respectively. Agreement reached only 20% for sites with no/limited bone fill. When no/limited and partial bone fill occurred, the radiographic analysis tended to overestimate bone fill and underestimate bone fill when complete closure of the defect sites was observed in the histologic analysis. Conclusion: Low accuracy was observed when radiographic evaluations were employed in identifying and characterizing bone fill in the rat calvaria osteotomy defects. Assessment of bone healing in animal models aiming at treatment recommendations for clinical application must not solely be based on radiographic analysis, but should be confirmed using histologic observations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)455-460
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Clinical Periodontology
Volume33
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2006

Fingerprint

Osteotomy
Osteogenesis
Skull
Bone and Bones
Platelet-Rich Plasma
Sprague Dawley Rats
Animal Models
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Bone formation
  • Calvaria
  • Comparative methods
  • Histology
  • Radiography
  • Rats

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Periodontics

Cite this

Validity of radiographic evaluations of bone formation in a rat calvaria osteotomy defect model. / Pryor, Mary E.; Susin, Cristiano; Wikesjö, Ulf M E.

In: Journal of Clinical Periodontology, Vol. 33, No. 6, 01.06.2006, p. 455-460.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pryor, Mary E. ; Susin, Cristiano ; Wikesjö, Ulf M E. / Validity of radiographic evaluations of bone formation in a rat calvaria osteotomy defect model. In: Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2006 ; Vol. 33, No. 6. pp. 455-460.
@article{616ce552bb374e078c2dd08258511c8c,
title = "Validity of radiographic evaluations of bone formation in a rat calvaria osteotomy defect model",
abstract = "Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the validity of radiographic evaluations of bone formation in a critical-size rat calvaria osteotomy defect model. Methods: Bilateral, critical-size (∅ 6 mm) calvaria osteotomy defects in 30 adult Sprague-Dawley rats treated with a rat platelet-rich plasma preparation or control treatments were evaluated by radiographic and histometric measures following a 4- or 8-week healing interval. Standardized radiographic images of the rat calvaria gross specimens were used to assess bone formation within the defect sites by visual evaluation of the grey scale by three masked examiners. The most central portion of each defect site was subject to histometric analysis using a PC-based image analysis system. Kappa statistics and percentage agreement between the radiographic and histometric analysis were estimated. Results: Radiographic evaluations of bone formation are associated with significant weaknesses poorly representing actual healing events; κ statistics (0.17) denoting slight agreement beyond chance. Perfect agreement between the histologic and radiographic analysis for defect sites showing complete and partial histologic bone fill was achieved 63{\%} and 50{\%} of the time, respectively. Agreement reached only 20{\%} for sites with no/limited bone fill. When no/limited and partial bone fill occurred, the radiographic analysis tended to overestimate bone fill and underestimate bone fill when complete closure of the defect sites was observed in the histologic analysis. Conclusion: Low accuracy was observed when radiographic evaluations were employed in identifying and characterizing bone fill in the rat calvaria osteotomy defects. Assessment of bone healing in animal models aiming at treatment recommendations for clinical application must not solely be based on radiographic analysis, but should be confirmed using histologic observations.",
keywords = "Bone formation, Calvaria, Comparative methods, Histology, Radiography, Rats",
author = "Pryor, {Mary E.} and Cristiano Susin and Wikesj{\"o}, {Ulf M E}",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.00921.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "455--460",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Periodontology",
issn = "0303-6979",
publisher = "Blackwell Munksgaard",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validity of radiographic evaluations of bone formation in a rat calvaria osteotomy defect model

AU - Pryor, Mary E.

AU - Susin, Cristiano

AU - Wikesjö, Ulf M E

PY - 2006/6/1

Y1 - 2006/6/1

N2 - Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the validity of radiographic evaluations of bone formation in a critical-size rat calvaria osteotomy defect model. Methods: Bilateral, critical-size (∅ 6 mm) calvaria osteotomy defects in 30 adult Sprague-Dawley rats treated with a rat platelet-rich plasma preparation or control treatments were evaluated by radiographic and histometric measures following a 4- or 8-week healing interval. Standardized radiographic images of the rat calvaria gross specimens were used to assess bone formation within the defect sites by visual evaluation of the grey scale by three masked examiners. The most central portion of each defect site was subject to histometric analysis using a PC-based image analysis system. Kappa statistics and percentage agreement between the radiographic and histometric analysis were estimated. Results: Radiographic evaluations of bone formation are associated with significant weaknesses poorly representing actual healing events; κ statistics (0.17) denoting slight agreement beyond chance. Perfect agreement between the histologic and radiographic analysis for defect sites showing complete and partial histologic bone fill was achieved 63% and 50% of the time, respectively. Agreement reached only 20% for sites with no/limited bone fill. When no/limited and partial bone fill occurred, the radiographic analysis tended to overestimate bone fill and underestimate bone fill when complete closure of the defect sites was observed in the histologic analysis. Conclusion: Low accuracy was observed when radiographic evaluations were employed in identifying and characterizing bone fill in the rat calvaria osteotomy defects. Assessment of bone healing in animal models aiming at treatment recommendations for clinical application must not solely be based on radiographic analysis, but should be confirmed using histologic observations.

AB - Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the validity of radiographic evaluations of bone formation in a critical-size rat calvaria osteotomy defect model. Methods: Bilateral, critical-size (∅ 6 mm) calvaria osteotomy defects in 30 adult Sprague-Dawley rats treated with a rat platelet-rich plasma preparation or control treatments were evaluated by radiographic and histometric measures following a 4- or 8-week healing interval. Standardized radiographic images of the rat calvaria gross specimens were used to assess bone formation within the defect sites by visual evaluation of the grey scale by three masked examiners. The most central portion of each defect site was subject to histometric analysis using a PC-based image analysis system. Kappa statistics and percentage agreement between the radiographic and histometric analysis were estimated. Results: Radiographic evaluations of bone formation are associated with significant weaknesses poorly representing actual healing events; κ statistics (0.17) denoting slight agreement beyond chance. Perfect agreement between the histologic and radiographic analysis for defect sites showing complete and partial histologic bone fill was achieved 63% and 50% of the time, respectively. Agreement reached only 20% for sites with no/limited bone fill. When no/limited and partial bone fill occurred, the radiographic analysis tended to overestimate bone fill and underestimate bone fill when complete closure of the defect sites was observed in the histologic analysis. Conclusion: Low accuracy was observed when radiographic evaluations were employed in identifying and characterizing bone fill in the rat calvaria osteotomy defects. Assessment of bone healing in animal models aiming at treatment recommendations for clinical application must not solely be based on radiographic analysis, but should be confirmed using histologic observations.

KW - Bone formation

KW - Calvaria

KW - Comparative methods

KW - Histology

KW - Radiography

KW - Rats

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646679135&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646679135&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.00921.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.00921.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 16677336

AN - SCOPUS:33646679135

VL - 33

SP - 455

EP - 460

JO - Journal of Clinical Periodontology

JF - Journal of Clinical Periodontology

SN - 0303-6979

IS - 6

ER -