Variations in Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) mapping: From the natural language of patron terms to the controlled vocabulary of mapped lists

Lora V. Gault, Mary Shultz, Kathy J. Davies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: This study compared the mapping of natural language patron terms to the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) across six MeSH interfaces for the MEDLINE database. Methods: Test data were obtained from search requests submitted by patrons to the Library of the Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, over a nine-month period. Search request statements were parsed into separate terms or phrases. Using print sources from the National Library of Medicine, Each parsed patron term was assigned corresponding MeSH terms. Each patron term was entered into each of the selected interfaces to determine how effectively they mapped to MeSH. Data were collected for mapping success, accessibility of MeSH term within mapped list, and total number of MeSH choices within each list. Results: The selected MEDLINE interfaces do not map the same patron term in the same way, nor do they consistently lead to what is considered the appropriate MeSH term. Conclusions: If searchers utilize the MEDLINE database to its fullest potential by mapping to MeSH, the results of the mapping will vary between interfaces. This variance may ultimately impact the search results. These differences should be considered when choosing a MEDLINE interface and when instructing end users.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)173-180
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the Medical Library Association
Volume90
Issue number2
StatePublished - Apr 1 2002

Fingerprint

Medical Subject Headings
Controlled Vocabulary
vocabulary
Language
health science
language
MEDLINE
medicine
Databases
National Library of Medicine (U.S.)
Medical Libraries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

@article{d6468bd968334d2c8c6a14be3d49d610,
title = "Variations in Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) mapping: From the natural language of patron terms to the controlled vocabulary of mapped lists",
abstract = "Objectives: This study compared the mapping of natural language patron terms to the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) across six MeSH interfaces for the MEDLINE database. Methods: Test data were obtained from search requests submitted by patrons to the Library of the Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, over a nine-month period. Search request statements were parsed into separate terms or phrases. Using print sources from the National Library of Medicine, Each parsed patron term was assigned corresponding MeSH terms. Each patron term was entered into each of the selected interfaces to determine how effectively they mapped to MeSH. Data were collected for mapping success, accessibility of MeSH term within mapped list, and total number of MeSH choices within each list. Results: The selected MEDLINE interfaces do not map the same patron term in the same way, nor do they consistently lead to what is considered the appropriate MeSH term. Conclusions: If searchers utilize the MEDLINE database to its fullest potential by mapping to MeSH, the results of the mapping will vary between interfaces. This variance may ultimately impact the search results. These differences should be considered when choosing a MEDLINE interface and when instructing end users.",
author = "Gault, {Lora V.} and Mary Shultz and Davies, {Kathy J.}",
year = "2002",
month = "4",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "90",
pages = "173--180",
journal = "Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA",
issn = "1536-5050",
publisher = "Medical Library Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variations in Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) mapping

T2 - From the natural language of patron terms to the controlled vocabulary of mapped lists

AU - Gault, Lora V.

AU - Shultz, Mary

AU - Davies, Kathy J.

PY - 2002/4/1

Y1 - 2002/4/1

N2 - Objectives: This study compared the mapping of natural language patron terms to the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) across six MeSH interfaces for the MEDLINE database. Methods: Test data were obtained from search requests submitted by patrons to the Library of the Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, over a nine-month period. Search request statements were parsed into separate terms or phrases. Using print sources from the National Library of Medicine, Each parsed patron term was assigned corresponding MeSH terms. Each patron term was entered into each of the selected interfaces to determine how effectively they mapped to MeSH. Data were collected for mapping success, accessibility of MeSH term within mapped list, and total number of MeSH choices within each list. Results: The selected MEDLINE interfaces do not map the same patron term in the same way, nor do they consistently lead to what is considered the appropriate MeSH term. Conclusions: If searchers utilize the MEDLINE database to its fullest potential by mapping to MeSH, the results of the mapping will vary between interfaces. This variance may ultimately impact the search results. These differences should be considered when choosing a MEDLINE interface and when instructing end users.

AB - Objectives: This study compared the mapping of natural language patron terms to the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) across six MeSH interfaces for the MEDLINE database. Methods: Test data were obtained from search requests submitted by patrons to the Library of the Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, over a nine-month period. Search request statements were parsed into separate terms or phrases. Using print sources from the National Library of Medicine, Each parsed patron term was assigned corresponding MeSH terms. Each patron term was entered into each of the selected interfaces to determine how effectively they mapped to MeSH. Data were collected for mapping success, accessibility of MeSH term within mapped list, and total number of MeSH choices within each list. Results: The selected MEDLINE interfaces do not map the same patron term in the same way, nor do they consistently lead to what is considered the appropriate MeSH term. Conclusions: If searchers utilize the MEDLINE database to its fullest potential by mapping to MeSH, the results of the mapping will vary between interfaces. This variance may ultimately impact the search results. These differences should be considered when choosing a MEDLINE interface and when instructing end users.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036547278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036547278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11999175

AN - SCOPUS:0036547278

VL - 90

SP - 173

EP - 180

JO - Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA

JF - Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA

SN - 1536-5050

IS - 2

ER -