Volumetric analysis of endoscopic and traditional surgical approaches to the infratemporal fossa

Carol E. Fahmy, Ricardo Carrau, Claudia Kirsch, Darlene Meeks, Danielle De Lara, Clementino Arturo Solares, Bradley A. Otto, Daniel M. Prevedello

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis In an effort to decrease morbidity, skull base surgeons have explored less invasive approaches to the infratemporal fossa, including endonasal-endoscopy, minicraniotomies, and transantral endoscopic and microscopic corridors. This project presents quantitative data that assesses the practicality, and volumetric exposure afforded by endonasal and open approaches to the infratemporal fossa. Study Design First, the study defines the anatomy of endoscopic-endonasal and preauricular approaches to the infratemporal fossa. Subsequently, the study involved the calculation of anatomical volumes using cadaveric and virtual models. Methods Computed tomography (CT) scanning of two anatomical specimens served to recreate computer simulations of the endonasal and preauricular approaches, allowing for the assessment of the infratemporal fossae volumes. In addition, the dissections served to identify and mark critical surgical landmarks and boundaries. A second CT scan, after the surgical dissection, allowed for a reanalysis of the data for a volumetric comparison of the surgical approaches. Results Pre- and postdissection CT scans and computer simulations revealed that volumes in the open and endonasal approaches to the infratemporal fossa are strikingly similar, suggesting that volumes of surgical instrumentation and visualization may also be comparable. However, the entry gate for instrumentation differed significantly for each approach. Conclusion This study suggests that, although the entry gate for instrumentation is greater during an open approach, contrary to intuition, an open approach does not create a substantially larger working space or visual field. Analysis of volumetric measurements facilitates a better understanding of the indications for each procedure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1091-1096
Number of pages6
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume124
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Tomography
Computer Simulation
Dissection
Intuition
Skull Base
Visual Fields
Endoscopy
Anatomy
Morbidity
Surgeons

Keywords

  • Infratemporal fossa
  • endoscopy
  • skull base
  • surgical anatomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Fahmy, C. E., Carrau, R., Kirsch, C., Meeks, D., De Lara, D., Solares, C. A., ... Prevedello, D. M. (2014). Volumetric analysis of endoscopic and traditional surgical approaches to the infratemporal fossa. Laryngoscope, 124(5), 1091-1096. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24428

Volumetric analysis of endoscopic and traditional surgical approaches to the infratemporal fossa. / Fahmy, Carol E.; Carrau, Ricardo; Kirsch, Claudia; Meeks, Darlene; De Lara, Danielle; Solares, Clementino Arturo; Otto, Bradley A.; Prevedello, Daniel M.

In: Laryngoscope, Vol. 124, No. 5, 01.01.2014, p. 1091-1096.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fahmy, CE, Carrau, R, Kirsch, C, Meeks, D, De Lara, D, Solares, CA, Otto, BA & Prevedello, DM 2014, 'Volumetric analysis of endoscopic and traditional surgical approaches to the infratemporal fossa', Laryngoscope, vol. 124, no. 5, pp. 1091-1096. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24428
Fahmy CE, Carrau R, Kirsch C, Meeks D, De Lara D, Solares CA et al. Volumetric analysis of endoscopic and traditional surgical approaches to the infratemporal fossa. Laryngoscope. 2014 Jan 1;124(5):1091-1096. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24428
Fahmy, Carol E. ; Carrau, Ricardo ; Kirsch, Claudia ; Meeks, Darlene ; De Lara, Danielle ; Solares, Clementino Arturo ; Otto, Bradley A. ; Prevedello, Daniel M. / Volumetric analysis of endoscopic and traditional surgical approaches to the infratemporal fossa. In: Laryngoscope. 2014 ; Vol. 124, No. 5. pp. 1091-1096.
@article{758a08b294734c468f9d9559a1d6ee1c,
title = "Volumetric analysis of endoscopic and traditional surgical approaches to the infratemporal fossa",
abstract = "Objectives/Hypothesis In an effort to decrease morbidity, skull base surgeons have explored less invasive approaches to the infratemporal fossa, including endonasal-endoscopy, minicraniotomies, and transantral endoscopic and microscopic corridors. This project presents quantitative data that assesses the practicality, and volumetric exposure afforded by endonasal and open approaches to the infratemporal fossa. Study Design First, the study defines the anatomy of endoscopic-endonasal and preauricular approaches to the infratemporal fossa. Subsequently, the study involved the calculation of anatomical volumes using cadaveric and virtual models. Methods Computed tomography (CT) scanning of two anatomical specimens served to recreate computer simulations of the endonasal and preauricular approaches, allowing for the assessment of the infratemporal fossae volumes. In addition, the dissections served to identify and mark critical surgical landmarks and boundaries. A second CT scan, after the surgical dissection, allowed for a reanalysis of the data for a volumetric comparison of the surgical approaches. Results Pre- and postdissection CT scans and computer simulations revealed that volumes in the open and endonasal approaches to the infratemporal fossa are strikingly similar, suggesting that volumes of surgical instrumentation and visualization may also be comparable. However, the entry gate for instrumentation differed significantly for each approach. Conclusion This study suggests that, although the entry gate for instrumentation is greater during an open approach, contrary to intuition, an open approach does not create a substantially larger working space or visual field. Analysis of volumetric measurements facilitates a better understanding of the indications for each procedure.",
keywords = "Infratemporal fossa, endoscopy, skull base, surgical anatomy",
author = "Fahmy, {Carol E.} and Ricardo Carrau and Claudia Kirsch and Darlene Meeks and {De Lara}, Danielle and Solares, {Clementino Arturo} and Otto, {Bradley A.} and Prevedello, {Daniel M.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/lary.24428",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "124",
pages = "1091--1096",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Volumetric analysis of endoscopic and traditional surgical approaches to the infratemporal fossa

AU - Fahmy, Carol E.

AU - Carrau, Ricardo

AU - Kirsch, Claudia

AU - Meeks, Darlene

AU - De Lara, Danielle

AU - Solares, Clementino Arturo

AU - Otto, Bradley A.

AU - Prevedello, Daniel M.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Objectives/Hypothesis In an effort to decrease morbidity, skull base surgeons have explored less invasive approaches to the infratemporal fossa, including endonasal-endoscopy, minicraniotomies, and transantral endoscopic and microscopic corridors. This project presents quantitative data that assesses the practicality, and volumetric exposure afforded by endonasal and open approaches to the infratemporal fossa. Study Design First, the study defines the anatomy of endoscopic-endonasal and preauricular approaches to the infratemporal fossa. Subsequently, the study involved the calculation of anatomical volumes using cadaveric and virtual models. Methods Computed tomography (CT) scanning of two anatomical specimens served to recreate computer simulations of the endonasal and preauricular approaches, allowing for the assessment of the infratemporal fossae volumes. In addition, the dissections served to identify and mark critical surgical landmarks and boundaries. A second CT scan, after the surgical dissection, allowed for a reanalysis of the data for a volumetric comparison of the surgical approaches. Results Pre- and postdissection CT scans and computer simulations revealed that volumes in the open and endonasal approaches to the infratemporal fossa are strikingly similar, suggesting that volumes of surgical instrumentation and visualization may also be comparable. However, the entry gate for instrumentation differed significantly for each approach. Conclusion This study suggests that, although the entry gate for instrumentation is greater during an open approach, contrary to intuition, an open approach does not create a substantially larger working space or visual field. Analysis of volumetric measurements facilitates a better understanding of the indications for each procedure.

AB - Objectives/Hypothesis In an effort to decrease morbidity, skull base surgeons have explored less invasive approaches to the infratemporal fossa, including endonasal-endoscopy, minicraniotomies, and transantral endoscopic and microscopic corridors. This project presents quantitative data that assesses the practicality, and volumetric exposure afforded by endonasal and open approaches to the infratemporal fossa. Study Design First, the study defines the anatomy of endoscopic-endonasal and preauricular approaches to the infratemporal fossa. Subsequently, the study involved the calculation of anatomical volumes using cadaveric and virtual models. Methods Computed tomography (CT) scanning of two anatomical specimens served to recreate computer simulations of the endonasal and preauricular approaches, allowing for the assessment of the infratemporal fossae volumes. In addition, the dissections served to identify and mark critical surgical landmarks and boundaries. A second CT scan, after the surgical dissection, allowed for a reanalysis of the data for a volumetric comparison of the surgical approaches. Results Pre- and postdissection CT scans and computer simulations revealed that volumes in the open and endonasal approaches to the infratemporal fossa are strikingly similar, suggesting that volumes of surgical instrumentation and visualization may also be comparable. However, the entry gate for instrumentation differed significantly for each approach. Conclusion This study suggests that, although the entry gate for instrumentation is greater during an open approach, contrary to intuition, an open approach does not create a substantially larger working space or visual field. Analysis of volumetric measurements facilitates a better understanding of the indications for each procedure.

KW - Infratemporal fossa

KW - endoscopy

KW - skull base

KW - surgical anatomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899449558&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899449558&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/lary.24428

DO - 10.1002/lary.24428

M3 - Article

VL - 124

SP - 1091

EP - 1096

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

IS - 5

ER -