What is the ideal interval between training sessions during proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training?

Dimitrios Stefanidis, Kenneth C Walters, Ana Mostafavi, B. Todd Heniford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to identify the ideal interval between training sessions in a proficiency-based laparoscopic suturing simulator curriculum. Methods: We analyzed performance data from 3 randomized controlled trials of novices (n = 66) who followed a similar proficiency-based simulator curriculum in laparoscopic suturing on the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery model. The change in performance and intertraining interval were correlated. Results: Overall participant performance improved from 530 ± 58 seconds at baseline to 81 ± 14 seconds at training completion (P < .001). Intertraining intervals ranged from 1 to 43 days and performance change between training sessions varied widely. There was no correlation of performance change with intertraining interval (r = .05, P = .30). Performance deterioration was similar at different intertraining intervals. Shorter intervals were associated, however, with shorter training duration (r = .35, P = .005). Conclusions: No association was found between intertraining interval and change in performance during proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training but shorter intervals were associated with improved skill acquisition. Further study is needed to confirm these findings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)126-129
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume197
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Curriculum
Laparoscopy
Randomized Controlled Trials
P-30 composite resin

Keywords

  • Intertraining interval
  • Laparoscopy
  • Simulation
  • Skills training
  • Suturing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

What is the ideal interval between training sessions during proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training? / Stefanidis, Dimitrios; Walters, Kenneth C; Mostafavi, Ana; Heniford, B. Todd.

In: American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 197, No. 1, 01.01.2009, p. 126-129.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stefanidis, Dimitrios ; Walters, Kenneth C ; Mostafavi, Ana ; Heniford, B. Todd. / What is the ideal interval between training sessions during proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training?. In: American Journal of Surgery. 2009 ; Vol. 197, No. 1. pp. 126-129.
@article{0a0319db4a144873bb1c80780756da78,
title = "What is the ideal interval between training sessions during proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training?",
abstract = "Background: The aim of this study was to identify the ideal interval between training sessions in a proficiency-based laparoscopic suturing simulator curriculum. Methods: We analyzed performance data from 3 randomized controlled trials of novices (n = 66) who followed a similar proficiency-based simulator curriculum in laparoscopic suturing on the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery model. The change in performance and intertraining interval were correlated. Results: Overall participant performance improved from 530 ± 58 seconds at baseline to 81 ± 14 seconds at training completion (P < .001). Intertraining intervals ranged from 1 to 43 days and performance change between training sessions varied widely. There was no correlation of performance change with intertraining interval (r = .05, P = .30). Performance deterioration was similar at different intertraining intervals. Shorter intervals were associated, however, with shorter training duration (r = .35, P = .005). Conclusions: No association was found between intertraining interval and change in performance during proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training but shorter intervals were associated with improved skill acquisition. Further study is needed to confirm these findings.",
keywords = "Intertraining interval, Laparoscopy, Simulation, Skills training, Suturing",
author = "Dimitrios Stefanidis and Walters, {Kenneth C} and Ana Mostafavi and Heniford, {B. Todd}",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.07.047",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "197",
pages = "126--129",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is the ideal interval between training sessions during proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training?

AU - Stefanidis, Dimitrios

AU - Walters, Kenneth C

AU - Mostafavi, Ana

AU - Heniford, B. Todd

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - Background: The aim of this study was to identify the ideal interval between training sessions in a proficiency-based laparoscopic suturing simulator curriculum. Methods: We analyzed performance data from 3 randomized controlled trials of novices (n = 66) who followed a similar proficiency-based simulator curriculum in laparoscopic suturing on the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery model. The change in performance and intertraining interval were correlated. Results: Overall participant performance improved from 530 ± 58 seconds at baseline to 81 ± 14 seconds at training completion (P < .001). Intertraining intervals ranged from 1 to 43 days and performance change between training sessions varied widely. There was no correlation of performance change with intertraining interval (r = .05, P = .30). Performance deterioration was similar at different intertraining intervals. Shorter intervals were associated, however, with shorter training duration (r = .35, P = .005). Conclusions: No association was found between intertraining interval and change in performance during proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training but shorter intervals were associated with improved skill acquisition. Further study is needed to confirm these findings.

AB - Background: The aim of this study was to identify the ideal interval between training sessions in a proficiency-based laparoscopic suturing simulator curriculum. Methods: We analyzed performance data from 3 randomized controlled trials of novices (n = 66) who followed a similar proficiency-based simulator curriculum in laparoscopic suturing on the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery model. The change in performance and intertraining interval were correlated. Results: Overall participant performance improved from 530 ± 58 seconds at baseline to 81 ± 14 seconds at training completion (P < .001). Intertraining intervals ranged from 1 to 43 days and performance change between training sessions varied widely. There was no correlation of performance change with intertraining interval (r = .05, P = .30). Performance deterioration was similar at different intertraining intervals. Shorter intervals were associated, however, with shorter training duration (r = .35, P = .005). Conclusions: No association was found between intertraining interval and change in performance during proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training but shorter intervals were associated with improved skill acquisition. Further study is needed to confirm these findings.

KW - Intertraining interval

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - Simulation

KW - Skills training

KW - Suturing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57649218693&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57649218693&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.07.047

DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.07.047

M3 - Article

VL - 197

SP - 126

EP - 129

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 1

ER -